Thats the one... not that it would have been any use in this case
Coco said:His voice?
Or Airsoundz.
Coco said:His voice?
Or Airsoundz.
Origamist said:No criticism intended, but it might have been easier to veer right (lane split) as it gives you a bigger buffer and you would not have had to brake so sharply and risk losing your front wheel.
ianrauk said:Thats the one... not that it would have been any use in this case
BentMikey said:Holding back a little more might be a better option, btw.
BentMikey said:Well think further ahead then, and slow down a little earlier.[/User31431]
![]()
magnatom said:That's alright. It's a fair point. However, the roads at this point are particularly narrow as I'm sure Coco will confirm (I know when I drive down here I don't like being next to an HGV) so it's not the sort of place I'd want to move to the right much, when I'm not sure what is in the right lane. However, in hindsight, it would have been the safest maneuver.
Origamist said:It's also not easy to steer right when your focus is heavily biased/fixated on a target vehicle/potential threat to your left - you get caught in a sort of pscyhological tractor beam that pulls you towards the car as it enters the carriageway.
Aperitif said:No - don't get one of those Mags - I love your 'ochs' 'n 'fooks'![]()
wafflycat said:Aye. Mags's language does not remind me of...
![]()
![]()