Smoke Free Generation

[Dogtrousers]

I've not seen much about this in the media. After the start of next year shops won't be able to sell tobacco products to anyone born after 1 January 2009.

Note the wording. Not "to anyone under 18 years of age". The date is hard-coded. If you turn 18 on the 1st of Jan you will be able to buy ciggies. But if you turn 18 on the 2nd you will never be able to buy ciggies. Ever. In the year 2049 they will be checking 60-year olds for proof of age.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/selling-tobacco-herbal-smoking-products-and-cigarette-papers

The aim is to create a smoke-free generation.

There's only one other country with a similar law - that's the Maldives. New Zealand passed such a law but a change of government meant that it got repealed before it was enforced. Some Australian states have been discussing it but I don't think anything has come of that.

I was a fairly heavy smoker from my teens into my 30s, punctuated by months and years of giving up here and there until eventually one giving-up campaign actually stuck long term.

It's a weird addiction. I was a heavy drinker and gave that up for health reasons too (in my 40s). If you offered me immunity from the physical harm caused by alcohol I wouldn't be interested. I'm done with it. But if someone said I could take a pill and tobacco smoking would have no ill effects on me I'd grab the pill and dash off down the tobacconists shop.

Not starting smoking is a tremendously good idea. I've no idea if this law will help. I hope so.

 

[fossyant]

The kids all vape anyway ! No body smokes ciggys, certainly youngsters. They vape heavily.

 

[Drago]

Thell be happy to hop kpin a car and drive 200 feet and pollute the air we all breathe as soon as theyre old enough.

 

[Once a Wheeler]

In general, I am in favour of this. However, how does the law then treat people who smoke cigarettes which have been given to them? It would seem sensible to leave that question alone since people trying a cigarette out of curiosity to know what it felt like would not be criminalized. Time will tell if restrictions need increasing or reducing. And, of course, there is a background assumption that one should try to keep healthy if you are going to rely on the NHS. Though even that is debatable as activities such as rock climbing, motor racing and a host of other sports and activities naturally involve an increased degree of risk.

 

[farfromtheland]

Does this include nicotine patches? Nicotine can be a useful anti-inflammatory but you have to read Chinese and Indian medical research to discover this.

 

[Dorset Boy]

In general, I am in favour of this. However, how does the law then treat people who smoke cigarettes which have been given to them? It would seem sensible to leave that question alone since people trying a cigarette out of curiosity to know what it felt like would not be criminalized. Time will tell if restrictions need increasing or reducing. And, of course, there is a background assumption that one should try to keep healthy if you are going to rely on the NHS. Though even that is debatable as activities such as rock climbing, motor racing and a host of other sports and activities naturally involve an increased degree of risk.

Isn't horse riding the most dangerous past time of the lot?

 

[tyred]

I support the idea in principle, but a lot of fags out there come from the black market anyway.