Strava V Garmin

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Stockie

Ticking the boxes
Location
Chesterfield
hi all. I have recently started to us strava on my iPhone when out on bike while at same time using my garmin edge. Puzzled why at end of ride there is always difference between the two with regard to number of metres climbed. Strava is always less than Garmin, sometimes in excess of 100/200 metres.

Any ideas why this might be?
 

StuAff

Silencing his legs regularly
Location
Portsmouth
hi all. I have recently started to us strava on my iPhone when out on bike while at same time using my garmin edge. Puzzled why at end of ride there is always difference between the two with regard to number of metres climbed. Strava is always less than Garmin, sometimes in excess of 100/200 metres.

Any ideas why this might be?
No two sources of elevation data will ever agree. Don't worry about it.
 
hi all. I have recently started to us strava on my iPhone when out on bike while at same time using my garmin edge. Puzzled why at end of ride there is always difference between the two with regard to number of metres climbed. Strava is always less than Garmin, sometimes in excess of 100/200 metres.

Any ideas why this might be?
Garmin is cack. It uses a pressure sensor to work out elevation. It frequently gets it wrong because the sensor is rubbish.
 

S-Express

Guest
hi all. I have recently started to us strava on my iPhone when out on bike while at same time using my garmin edge. Puzzled why at end of ride there is always difference between the two with regard to number of metres climbed. Strava is always less than Garmin, sometimes in excess of 100/200 metres.

Any ideas why this might be?

Neither is perfect - lots to do with the algorithms and how the data is processed. Just choose one and stick with it.
 

grellboy

Veteran
I sometimes plan routes using " RidedwithGps" which I then follow on my Garmin, which I upload on Strava. Ridewithgps always vastly overestimates how high the climbs are, Strava always records a vastly lower total height and the Garmin seems to be just in between. Have no idea which is most accuracy unfortunately.
 

nickyboy

Norven Mankey
It's all about the granularity of the device's calculation of elevation. By that I mean some devices will record even very small changes in elevation whereas some devices will not. For example when I plan a route with Ridewithgps it always calculates a lower elevation than my Garmin 810 calculates on the actual ride. The reason is that the barometric calculator of the 810 recognises very small changes in altitude that don't even feature in the mapping software that Ridewithgps uses. Similarly, phones use the same mapping software (but are less accurate as they rely on the gps track of the ride) so will always give an elevation different from the Garmin

The Garmin recognises smaller changes in elevation than devices that rely on the gps/mapping software interface so I guess they give a truer representation of climbing metres
 

Joffey

Big Dosser
Location
Yorkshire
DC Rainmaker answered this on a podcast some time ago. GPS is terrible at working out elevation. To work it out you have to put a point on a map and then get the elevation from that map, problem is GPS that we use isn't accurate to the inch so you could get a read of elevatio from a point a few metres away. Imagine you are riding on a road with a sharp drop to your left and your GPS marks there - the elevation will be well wrong.

Strava interprets the GPS data from Garmin and passes it through its own algorithms. Also the maps they use might not exactly be the same, so you also get discrepancies here.

If you have a Garmin with an altimeter it will use that data source rather than trying to work out your elevation itself. I've found the altimeters from Garmin to be pretty accurate, give or take +/- 10%.

An interesting point re Strava. I plotted a 75 mile route on their route planner and the stated elevation gain was 2250 (from memory). I did the ride with 2 mates all using different Garmins (a 200 and a 25). My ride was recorded on a 520 with altimeter. Their elevation after uploading to a Strava was 1600 and 1750. Mine was 2150. A big difference but closer to what Strava said it would be. Interestingly the Garmin 200 stated a similar elevation before the rode was uploaded to Strava.

It's not that Garmins or altimeters are rubbish, it's the different ways Garmin / Strava interpret your data PLUS a GPS is pretty accurate on the horizontal but not the vertical.

As long as you are using the same device every ride at least your data will be consistent.

(I listened to the podcast about 6 months ago so hope I have explained his answer clearly).
 
Top Bottom