Add
Guru
- Location
- Powys, Wales
Bloody hell Bill, the graph for that first one looks like a wall not a hill!
I'd be tempted to have a bash at this months goat league, as they are relatively short bar one, but I have the 2nd half of the T100 to doBloody hell Bill, the graph for that first one looks like a wall not a hill!
I tried chasing your ghost on stage 4 yesterday. It hurtCould I get into the handicapped race on Thursday please Geoff?
Could be my only chance to be close to some of you lunatics at the finish line!![]()
Could I get into the handicapped race on Thursday please Geoff?
Could be my only chance to be close to some of you lunatics at the finish line!![]()
I tried chasing your ghost on stage 4 yesterday. It hurt![]()
![]()
Cheers Geofftheboxers, on Stage 2 you finished just behind Jamie (8.5) and ahead of bazer99 (8.0), Stage 3 right at the back (very flat profile) and Stage 4 behind TurboTommy (9.5) but ahead of Rob (10.0).
So we could go with 8.0, 9.5 or the 6.5 discussed.
Go on, pick a figure that you think you can live with... we can then adjust if need be if you do the second run.
I'm keen to give everyone a fair run at a high finish, but also keen to avoid anyone running away with it, as it will spoil the close finish we are going for.
Looking at at these finishing places, it is interesting how varied they are, which I presume is often due to the profile.
Cheers,
Geoff
I still smile at the memory of doing that bloody awful ride twice in one evening, after getting my BKool poke about having been challenged and beaten by you, by 1 bloody second. I just couldn't let it go... .
Bloody hell Bill, the graph for that first one looks like a wall not a hill!
I'll go with the 6.5 atm![]()
I had enough of that when I as an young student had to repair my Citroen Visa myself. When I was done I had a bag of nuts and bolts leftovers, but who's counting
. I got it running again, but the damn thing broke down on me not too long after...never figured out why
.
The Top 3 results of the latest goat league are as follows:
Tacx Vortex/Other:
1/ Rob H
2/ Baldo Mero
3/ Monte
Just for clarification - I've only used a Tacx Neo for one ride, I borrowed the trainer from a friend to try out.
I was worried that the usual suspects would hit the front too early in the race, but the more I think about it the harder I think it is going to be to shake off someone who is normally just a little slower than you. So as people close up into little groups it might be hard to pull away from them. Dropping one person is a lot easier then dropping a group of several, as they'll have the option of drafting each other and sharing the work to close back up again.
It is certainly possible that anyone among the faster guys can gain enough to give top 3 a run for it, but equally one of the earlier starters could gain considerable amounts of time from drafting and the additional motivation, so we may get a surprise winner.
The variation in order from stage to stage seems quite pronounced, and working out fair starting times is proving difficult, as many runs are affected by external influences or fitness/motivation.
In reality, we really need the fastest times from many attempts at the actual stage being run to get an accurate handicap for everyone. I suggest that if the handicaps prove popular that stages are repeated to get more accurate handicaps, but perhaps, for variety, a number of popular stages are rotated so each is done regularly but not too often that it becomes dull.
For example, stages like Alpe d'Huez are repeated endlessly, so they make good candidates.
Geoff
Less than 48 hrs and I may have a chanceOK, if you can do it in less than 48 minutes you'll be in with a chance of the win!
And Gail's got a bit more breathing space...![]()