The great cycling hoax

[CopperBrompton]

I'm surprised that with all the 9/11 and moon-landing stuff, no-one has yet exposed the great cycling hoax.

The government claims that a two-wheeled vehicle with rounded tyres can not only remain upright, but also propel itself along the road by means of some claimed 'pedalling' action.

A simple experiment will readily demonstrate that the vehicles in question will immediately fall over. In lab tests, a so-called bicycle was placed on a flat surface in an upright position and then the supporting hand removed. In *every single case*, the bicycle fell over to one side or the other within a matter of a second or two.

As for the 'pedalling' idea, if you examine the government claims, they show the supposed 'rider' pushing down on the pedal on one side at a time. So they serious expect us to accept that a vehicle *that will already fall over all on its own* can have a force applied to one side only and won't fall over even faster!

Ben

 

[Globalti]

Perhaps in 100 years when humans are incapable of self-propelled movement, yes, deniers will claim that cycling never happened.

 

[Davidc]

I'm surprised that with all the 9/11 and moon-landing stuff, no-one has yet exposed the great cycling hoax.

The government claims that a two-wheeled vehicle with rounded tyres can not only remain upright, but also propel itself along the road by means of some claimed 'pedalling' action.

A simple experiment will readily demonstrate that the vehicles in question will immediately fall over. In lab tests, a so-called bicycle was placed on a flat surface in an upright position and then the supporting hand removed. In *every single case*, the bicycle fell over to one side or the other within a matter of a second or two.

As for the 'pedalling' idea, if you examine the government claims, they show the supposed 'rider' pushing down on the pedal on one side at a time. So they serious expect us to accept that a vehicle *that will already fall over all on its own* can have a force applied to one side only and won't fall over even faster!

Ben

And to back it up the French film industry has been employed to fake pictures of these vehicles being *pedalled* up the roads into the alps.

it's quite clear to anyone with a milligram of sense that no human could possibly make a vehicle go that fast up those hills without a motor (or a large dose of performance enhancing substance...) and that the whole thing has been faked in a top secret studio, entirely with second hand Thunderbirds kit.

The company responsible for this conspiracy is rumoured to be called "Tricheurs de France" aka TdF

 

[stoatsngroats]

The government claims that a two-wheeled vehicle with rounded tyres can not only remain upright, but also propel itself along the road by means of some claimed 'pedalling' action.

I think it's you that's been had Ben......










Everyone knows that the THIRD WHEEL, which is a necessary addition for this kind of device, is CLOAKED.........Your avatar shows such a contraption, albeit with a defective cloaking device......

 

[661-Pete]

There is a special type of vehicle, known in the trade as a "BMW", always to be seen in very close proximity to one of these supposed 'bicycles' - usually only a matter of inches away, and blaring its horn (usually the driver contributing to the jarring sound emission). The letters of course stand for Bicycle-Maintaining Wireholder and the purpose of this vehicle of course is to secure the wires which hold the two-wheeled vehicle upright.

The horn and other sounds are of course to keep the wires in vibration and hence maintain their flexibility.

Certain individuals who purport to be able to balance unaided on these so-called 'bicycles' (Magnatom?) have actually filmed footage of these support vehicles whilst they are in close proximity to said bicycle. And then they have even had the temerity to airbrush out the wires so as to perpetuate the hoax....

Have I got that right?

 

[Mac66]

The clue is in the name bi = 2, cycle = bike.

2xBike = 4 wheels, which accounts for the stability of these apparently 2 wheeled devices.

It's all done with smoke, provided by car exhasusts and mirrors, again from cars, which accounts for the high proportion of cyclists being ill or hit by close passing car mirrors

 

[spandex]

You can make a bike that will go in a straight line for miles with no one on it but will be s**t at going round corners. You can make a bike that will go round corners but can not go in a straight line. You can not have both as in when you ride your bike you fall to the sides and if you are very good you can get it so you correct it very quickly.

 

[jnb]

Of course men of reason have examined this and determined that in fact bicycles are in fact the most stable vehicles available. On comparison with cars it was discovered that in every case the cars needed four wheels in order to remain upright(*)!, as opposed to the two wheels required for a bike thus demonstrating that bikes are twice as stable as cars.

(*NB for the purpose of this research robin reliants were deemed to be a statistical anomaly)