adunn01 said:
The only thing that's still not clear to me is why it was safe for you to follow the other cyclist and pass through the gap between a moving truck and a bus
Never happened. The bus and the truck were static when I went past.
but completely unsafe for you to follow when he comfortably passed a car with feet to spare because you'd spotted a sign telling the driver to give way to oncoming traffic.
Read the thread. The car slowed to a stop and a gap emerged sufficiently wide to pass entirely because I held the lane. I ride that route every day, if you don't do as I did then the car will accelerate through the gap leaving minimum passing distance, which is unsafe and there have been numerous incidents in which cyclists have been clipped there doing precisely what you'd have me do (shopkeepers in that street have recently raised awareness of the dangers of that road, specifically citing this risk). Don't tell the guy and he'll do it tomorrow to. Stop and tell him and next time you see him he doesn't do it; yes, I've experience of doing that there, over, and over.
Just smacked a little of confrontation for the sake of confrontation, safe in the knowledge you had a road sign you felt backed you up.
But then again, you can come back with the cutting "you're too passive if you don't agree with the way I behaved" and that'll be my opinion totally useless.
You are too passive if you believe that you should do as you suggest here; the evidence is that a number of cyclists have been clipped doing that on Magdalene Street and, to my knowledge, no one holding primary and explaining the errors made by an oncoming motorist has.