Bollo said:Unfortunately short pop-current affairs programmes like this can only address an issue at the most superficial level. They're supported by researchers who will have little or no knowledge of the subject matter (today cyclists, tomorrow "what's in our bacon?"). The easiest thing to do is reach for the big book of cliches, in this case by choosing a programme title and format that emphasise the apparent conflict between road users.
The most dangerous aspect IMHO of these programmes is the illusory search for 'balance'. The blame, and certainly the consequences of incidents between cyclists and motorists are not in any way 'balanced'. We make a mistake or misbehave on the roads - we suffer. A driver makes a mistake or misbehaves on the road - we suffer. What's needed isn't balance, because it doesn't in any way reflect the imbalance in the figures or our experiences. We need a decent polemic made by someone who gives a sh1t.
Spot on, Bollo. In fact, I wish I'd written it!