Were the moon landings faked.

[outlash]

It doesn't. Australia as a geologically shares a plate with New Guinea. But the common definition of Australia is a country in the wider continent of Australasia\Oceania, none of which are on or near the North American plate.

 

[Joey Shabadoo]

Continents are a bit of a moveable feast for a start;

Moveable feast - continents, tectonic plates ...

 

[Flying_Monkey]

[QUOTE 3983778, member: 45"]England is a continent.[/QUOTE]

England is incontinent.

It's easy to get confused.

 

[vernon]

[QUOTE 3983778, member: 45"]England is a continent.[/QUOTE]

England is incontinent.

It's easy to get confused.

Ask a Yorkshireman and he'll put you both right, "England is in't continent."

 

[jefmcg]

Seriously, if you think this article has a left bias, please point out the errors. It seems to be rational, founded on fact and written in clear English. If it's "gobbledygook" it should only take a sentence or two to point it out.

 

[SD1]

if you think this article has a left bias, please point out the errors.

So to be lefty bias it must have errors.

Sesquipedalian. Unnecessarily so. A favourite of you leftys. Gobbledygook aka meaningless sh1te.

 

[Glow worm]

I suspect this isn't going to end well.

 

[jefmcg]

So to be lefty bias it must have errors.

Ok, learning disabled.

If something has no errors in it's premises, nor any errors in the logic applied to those premises, then it's truth. If it has a bias, then there must be errors.

Or do you believe the truth has a left wing bias?

 

[jefmcg]

Sesquipedalian

OK, had to google this.

Apparently it means "polysyllabic; long". A lovely, ironic word, that is guilty of the crime it is describing.

From the post you called "lefty", here are the words 10 characters or longer. Which are the ones that are giving you trouble?

boundaries
completely
constructs
continents
difference
geological
archipelago
geophysical
politically
conventional
nomenclature
sociopolitical

 

[Lonestar]

I actually thought Jose Mourinho taking defeat in grace was more faked.

 

[gavroche]

I believe in the moon landings but many don't so I wonder if it would be possible to prove it once and for all but showing the remnants of those landings through a powerful telescope. What do you think?

 

[TVC]

And so it begins again....

 

[Drago]

Japan and Russia, neither of who are huge fans of Uncle Sam, have both photographed the remains of the Apollo craft on the surface from orbit. They both even managed to get images of the trails of footprints.

You could do it with a sufficiently enormous Earth based telescope, but at such relatively close range (in astronomical terms) and the close focus required you'll find atmospheric abberation a problem. Fit your giant telescope on a mountain top to make the best of it, but really a low seliocentric orbit is your best bet.

Or build a spaceship and go visit yourself.

 

[Crackle]

What about borrowing that Marks and Sparks one? I mean John Lewis.

 

[vernon]

John Lewis are honest traders and they show a man on the moon so it must be true.