[QUOTE 5125755, member: 10119"]I have quite a 'primary' perspective on school PE, where the gender divides are much less marked in terms of who does what - although some extra curricular clubs are male or female dominated, everyone does everything in lessons and actually at my son's school two of the strongest players on the footie team (the one that plays against other schools' "boys team") are girls. Everyone does netball, everyone does dodgeball, everyone does tag rugby.... My personal experience was that despite never having been remotely sporty - my dyspraxic tendencies and poor eyesight make any kind of ball games a fairly high-risk activity - I managed to represent my primary in several school teams because the school I attended was so tiny that it needed all the girls in the 'juniors' to make a side! At secondary, judging by the experience of the EldestCub, it seems a lot more traditional with the girls doing hockey/netball and the boys football/basketball and so on.
@Andrew_P - are there any extra-curricular clubs locally that would allow your daughter to access the sports that she prefers?[/QUOTE]
Sorry quoted you but only the first paragraph is a direct reply, post ended up much longer than I anticipated..
She does do Gymnastics, the School runs after School Football which she quite enjoys. She has a real talent for anything athletic at 13 she could go to my work and back 30 mile round trip and I would barely have to make any allowance for her being with me which for 13 is pretty good. She is looking for local Women's Basketball clubs, but not many around.
When I next speak to my eldest I will ask her about cycling she used to cycle to work through London and currently gets around Bath by bike and does a bit of Deliveroo she has never really mentioned harassment other than the normal Driver/Cyclist stuff but then I have never really asked the question. She treats the bike purely as transport.
Out of my 3 daughters 2 are keen on cycling the eldest is 21 this year. When she lived and worked in London her preference was to take as much as possible paths and avoid the roads as much as possible, my youngest 14 is fairly nervous on the roads partly due to news items, friends and family perception of danger and unfortunately experience. She is fine with me but not confident enough to go solo. There is a tendency from people to consider me taking my kids out on their bikes on main roads as dangerous and if I am entirely honest I had never really thought about it much but I am pretty sure this would not have been so strongly felt had they been boys. This seems to perpetuate itself in to peoples risk assessing when they get older and also seems to be weighted heavier towards females and "danger" both in their perception and reinforced by others should they even mention they are think of riding a bike on the road (are you mad?) which again is pretty strange but it does seem to stick.
I would think a large part of lack of cycling by females is the infrastructure and maybe the perception of what a cyclist normally looks like. Weird Shorts, weird helmets, funny shoes, road bikes, flat out riding. Look at the picture of the Breeze ride video in that BBC article conformity to the stereo type of what a cyclist should look like thus perpetuating the myth! Compared to this, can you imagine the uproar if the BBC had featured images like this as examples of cycling?
When I was not cycling I had a perception based around the cyclists I normally saw an what a cyclist should look like. Looking back I think it was a bit of barrier to me, apart from the investment I wasn't sure at 46 I could get myself in to the clothing let alone go out in public to be ridiculed.
What I am driving at is unlike countries where Cycling is commonplace we don't get to see such a mixture of cyclists who use it for a means of transport wear normal clothes and take a leisurely plod up to the shops on a sit up normal bike. Its not seen as normal to see a female cycling in the UK anymore. Its is seen and referred to as a sport largely or men commuting in clothes that look like they should be in a race. Honestly I am not denouncing Lycra I wear it but I am pretty sure it is one of the barriers along side danger and infrastructure.
Perhaps in my naivety I never considered unwanted sexual harassment nor sexism by male cyclists, I am not even sure why they have broken out male cyclists per se in the sexism part to be honest if sexism is playing a part it is on the whole not just cyclists and honestly not just males at all. Trying telling your mother in law that you just rode in rush hour traffic with a your 13 year old daughter to see the reaction. Now whether this reaction would have been the same for a boy who knows, I have a feeling it may have been similar but not anywhere near as strongly put.
So really you have two ism's joining together Sexism and Cyclism as a group male or female it is acceptable in the wider public to denounce, insult, moan or take the mickey out of cyclists, you just have to listen or read the comments when cycling is being debated. Then add on to that the sexism\harassment when a female is seen in that group and it appears this then makes sexism even more focused and almost allowed.
So to get more people, including women cycling needs to be seen as normal regardless of your bike or what you wear, good for you, and safe. I fear we have a long way to go to get to seeing streets in the UK like the above, the first step would be stopping this obsession with Helmets