Deeferdonk
Senior Member
You're over complicating it. Road tax doesn't exist "kind of" or otherwise. Your argument that language and terminology change in common usage doesn't overrule the law. People who pay VED have no more right to use the roads than those who don't regardless of whether it adds to general taxation (a non car owning cyclist paying higher rate income tax could conceivably pay way more tax than a minimum wage car owner for instance - not that it matters). If some motorists believe that paying VED confers them special privileges over those who don't that's not my problem, they're just wrong.
Yes - it does, kind of ,- i explained in quite some detail, with examples and everythingRoad tax doesn't exist "kind of" or otherwise.
I never said it did!Your argument that language and terminology change in common usage doesn't overrule the law.
Exactly right. Who said it was otherwise?People who pay VED have no more right to use the roads than those who don't regardless of whether it adds to general taxation (a non car owning cyclist paying higher rate income tax could conceivably pay way more tax than a minimum wage car owner for instance - not that it matters). If some motorists believe that paying VED confers them special privileges over those who don't that's not my problem, they're just wrong.