xpc316e said:
I endorse the advice given above, but a trip to Dtek is going to be worthwhile wherever you are. Kevin holds a large stock; you can try all the different flavours, and then choose something used if you do not want to buy new. I haven't heard a bad word said about him.
I've got an excellent word to say for him, whichis that he saved me a grand, at least. I wasgoing to buy a recumbent or a trike, but I went and tried a load out at his place and came to the conclusion that the idea of a recumbent is shite.
What I found was that the under-seat-steering ones are not too difficult to handle, but not much lower than a normal bike - so hardly get any of the aerodynamic advantages.
Some of the above-seat-steering ones are low enough to get fairly low to get the aerodynamic advantage, but they are completely impossible to handle - twitchy to the point of being dangerous in my experience.
VERY hard to steer round corners, and tight manoevring and hill starts - forget it. And that was a challenge hurricane, fairly low but by no means the lowest.
From a bit of research it seems that it's basically a 6 month learning curve, obviously dependent on mileage, but from the blast I had on it I couldn't
notice any speed difference over again a normal bike - I would have had to fit a computer to tell, so it couldn't be more than about 5-10%, if that.
So i decided lack of agility and confidence and the lack of/negligibility of increase in speed made it not something i'd be atall willing to spend 4 figures on.
And the trikes, while fun going round corners, soon lost their novelty value because I expected the fact they were really low to the ground would make them seem faster, but in fact the opposite was the case.
I'm not saying recumbents are completely pointless/worthless for everybody, some get on with them fine, obviously - but all I would say is try before you buy - 'cos you may really like the idea of them, like I did, but then not take to it in the slightest.