What's your agenda?

Discussion in 'Helmet Discussions' started by User, 15 Aug 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. User

    User Guest

     
    MissTillyFlop likes this.
  2. lukesdad

    lukesdad Guest

    I am sceptical of so called evidence on both sides of the arguement ( its not a debate ). Relying on flawed evidence is not good yet one side seems happy to while ridiculing the other. Other than that I have no agenda.

    Good thread Adrian you ve made it off my ignore list :thumbsup:
     
    david k likes this.
  3. Norm

    Norm Guest

    Yes, and promotion of thinking about the appropriateness of riding kit to the conditions, and the idea that glasses and gloves are more likely to benefit than a helmet, and the realisation that a helmet will only protect a small part of the head at low impact speeds... etc.
     
    Davidc and david k like this.
  4. roadrash

    roadrash cycle chatterer

    i dont give a shite if anyone wears one or not^_^
     
    ComedyPilot, Eddy, tyred and 2 others like this.
  5. After a pretty serious crash that saw my helmet smashed but my melon in one piece I continue to wear one and always will, completely safe in the knowledge of it's limitations.

    I also don't give a shiny $hite whether others do, don't or occasionally might :tongue:
     
    Maylian and david k like this.
  6. Whilst I believe that a helmet may have some shielding function against rocks and some impacts, I'm not sold on them as the cure-all for everything that can go wrong.
    I think there's lots more research to be done to prove or disprove cycle helmets.

    I wear one due to spending 99% of my time off road, but don't expect miracles.

    Plus it won't shield you from an asswipe racing his mates to the pub in the Corsa as he sits on the floor with his arm stretched out like Superman.
    Stop telling us helmets would make a difference, start telling us it's time to enforce road laws.
     
    classic33 and david k like this.
  7. lukesdad

    lukesdad Guest

    Agenda was visible so I had to take a peek :whistle:
     
    david k likes this.
  8. snorri

    snorri Legendary Member

    My agenda?
    I'm for freedom to choose.:smile:
     
    david k likes this.
  9. ufkacbln

    ufkacbln Guest

    Make your own choice, but it should be genuinely informed

    Stupid statements, anecdata and "hint and run" all need to be challenged
     
  10. deptfordmarmoset

    deptfordmarmoset Full time tea drinker

    Location:
    Armonmy Way
    My agenda? Our choice.
     
    david k likes this.
  11. lukesdad

    lukesdad Guest

    Erm ^ this Adrian.... remember ? ^_^
     
  12. dellzeqq

    dellzeqq pre-talced and mighty

    Location:
    SW2
    my agenda is amasculine
     
    Thomk and theclaud like this.
  13. david k

    david k Hi

    Location:
    North West
    Make your own choice, and it is does not have to be deeply informed as long as you have the basic grasp of what it is, what its for and its limitations.

    As with all things, I believe that if this (think seat belts as a comparison) or anything else for that matter was proved to be of real benefit (pros) and that benefit outweighs and drawbacks (cons) then I would not appeal against compulsion.

    I think this is a lot different to promoting it and therefore it is not an 'agenda' as such. I just dont have an issue with experts (presuming these would be the ones making this decision) in making our lives safer.

    For now people can chose to wear or not it makes no difference to my life. But when people tell me I must be informed before I can chose to wear a helmet or they want to make me feel like I'm contributing to poor health by wearing one (the obesity argument) then I feel I am justified in challenging this. This is often wrongly presumed to be pro compulsion which it clearly isn't
    .
    All above is my opinion. (not to be confused intentionally or not with promoting of facts, studies, evidence or advice)
     
  14. screenman

    screenman Legendary Member

    R, "..and who are too retarded to understand the basics of evidence based research." makes you a retard in my books.

    I'm an anti compulsionist on the basis that compulsion is bad for cycling.

    Of course my own research leads me to wear one at all times on the bike.
     
  15. 400bhp

    400bhp Guru

    I have a genda.

    Male

    Suprised you need to ask.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice