I see it as a statement questioning the quality of the certification itself.
A cycle can have an accident with a vastly higher impact speed than a (non stunt) skateboard as such I question if the impact tests for one are suitable for the other.
The EN1708 is the only standard used for cycle helmets which is also used to certify helmets for non stunt skateboards. Why are no other standards used to certify cycle helmets used to also certify skateboard helmets?
The EN1078 helmet standard is hardly worth the paper it is written upon. In the US it is not recognised for sporting use and even in the UK, some organisers state higher standards. UK Cycling events for instance state that helmets must comply with:
t is mandatory that all riders wear a safety approved cycling helmet complying with latest ANSI Z90/4 or SNELL standards.
The other thing to note is that most other testing standards recognise these differences, Snell, ANSI, ASTM, CPSC all have separate standards for skateboards for this reason
Snell is considered to be the toughest to pass and also tests helmets "off the shelf" as opposed to batches produced specifically for testing
When buying a helmet:
Fit
Comfort
Snell certification or at least ANSI certification
Looks
Cost