Fnaar
Smutmaster General
- Location
- Thumberland
Or they could replace that drive belt thingy with some kind of metal chain with links, which could engage with teeth on a "chain wheel" (runs off to inventing shed)
Looks nice, but my ideal bike would have disc brakes. Or a least a disc front.
I'd be interested to see the rear triangle split too. It's not obvious from pictures so must be very neatly done.
Adoption of belt drives is still in its infancy though. I've never actually seen one being ridden. I think a change of frame design may be the way to go in order to accomodate them better rather than splitting the rear triangle. Attachment of the triangle above the the belt perhaps (the way some full sus mtbs do) or a longe axle/narrower frame so the rear pulley could be on the outside of the frame, though that would mean re-engineering of the hubs.
Or they could replace that drive belt thingy with some kind of metal chain with links, which could engage with teeth on a "chain wheel" (runs off to inventing shed)
the chimera, with its use of S&S couplings on the mainframe, suggests to me that what the world needs is something like a seatstay (or perhaps chainstay) S&S coupling to standardise belt drive fitment.
If you can persuade S&S couplings to considerable reduce their prices from £500+ a pair, I'm sure that the belt drive bike makers will each donate a bike to you to demonstrate their gratitude.
The current engineering solution is neat and unobtrusive and it was the same on the Dutch belt drive bike that I saw in Germany.
It has to be remembered that the bike that I had, had lots of components from the high end of the ranges available and the S&S couplings are an option and are not a standard feature.
Does anyone who buys a Rohloff bike, let alone one with a Gates belt drive, really care what it costs?![]()
My point re the couplings for belt drive is different frame builders do it different ways, and everyone then argues, as cyclists do, over the demerits of each method. A standard method developed by a company with the reputation of an S&S, or indeed a Rohloff, would, imo, make belt drive more acceptable to many more people.
(that and an Alfine hub so mere mortals can afford it!)
Trek were selling their Soho last year, which presumably they were turning out in large numbers. I'm not sure how they got on, but I see Evans have delisted them.Apart from the Chimera I have only seen one other belt drive bike - a Dutch built tourer on the Danube Cycleway.
The only vulnerable bit of the drive train in normal use is the rear derailleur. I would have thought that following the standard chain line was absolutely fine provided you are using singlespeed or a hub gear.Putting the drive train outside of the frame is not a good solution. The frame offers a degree of protection.
I asked the million dollar question - what to you do if the belt breaks?
Has anyone ever broken a Gates belt on a pedal cycle? I know of cases of belt slippage on MTB's in America, and a foaf had his Gates go on his Harley which was replaced under warranty iirc.
Bloke in the office next to me has one of these...
http://www.santosbik...ent/racefietsen
Looks pretty nice.
I might argue that a Strida is probably the commonest belt drive bike but you'd all argue it isn't a bike!
So that's why I frequently don't see one.
Has anyone seen one or more in the wild?