Zwift Chat

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
OP
OP
C

CXRAndy

Guru
Location
Lincs
I couldn't do any Sunday even the EASY recovery rides felt wiped out.

I felt pretty tired Sunday. Had to collect boy from party, 1.30am when we got home:tired:
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
Very close indeed Paul. Most who have compared the two trainers say that climbs are quite accurate, it's downhill and flats where a difference appears
Just looked at this Andy, and my fastest time on the descent of Box Hill is also on the Neo actually. The 7 times I've done are only separated by 10 seconds so there doesn't seem to be much in it at all between the Bkool and the Neo in terms of speed on a long descent like that - I suppose you'd expect this as Zwift takes over your speed for much of it anyway.

It was on the long flat section between the two ascents of Box Hill that I made up the most time on the Bkool vs the Neo. It's not completely pan flat of course, just no big hills, so this supports my theory that the main benefit the Bkool gives over the neo is during those minor changes in gradient. Comparing the various segments, Bkool watts show as higher almost every time, even when speed was slower on the Bkool (I don't think this could ALWAYS be due to drafting)
 

bobinski

Legendary Member
Location
Tulse Hill
Just looked at this Andy, and my fastest time on the descent of Box Hill is also on the Neo actually. The 7 times I've done are only separated by 10 seconds so there doesn't seem to be much in it at all between the Bkool and the Neo in terms of speed on a long descent like that - I suppose you'd expect this as Zwift takes over your speed for much of it anyway.

It was on the long flat section between the two ascents of Box Hill that I made up the most time on the Bkool vs the Neo. It's not completely pan flat of course, just no big hills, so this supports my theory that the main benefit the Bkool gives over the neo is during those minor changes in gradient. Comparing the various segments, Bkool watts show as higher almost every time, even when speed was slower on the Bkool (I don't think this could ALWAYS be due to drafting)

fwiw its worth i have always believed that the pro became more accurate the steeper the gradient going up. That said it has taken me the best part of a year with the NEO to beat my best uphill times set on the pro. That may of course be a reflection on me and my fitness.
Never underestimate the draft especially with all the evidence suggesting it works up to inclines of 4%.
 

Whorty

Gets free watts from the Atom ;)
Location
Wiltshire
The only way to definitely say you didn't have the Bkool fairy dust help is to try a Neo, Atom, Kickr, powertap or other power meters
The qualified accountant in me insisted I carry out a cost benefit analysis and the findings are the cost of £300+ doesn't give me any real benefits given my objectives of using the turbo. Knowing my real power number, assuming the Pro is over reading, won't actually get me any fitter. I ride for 60-90 mins and I'd still be doing that whether I have a power meter or not.

I've been researching the power meters and as always there are pros and cons of each one; at the £300-£400 price point there is the obvious issue that I can only get a one sided meter which may not be that accurate if I am significantly weaker on my left side and I'm not prepared to shell out double that for a two sided meter.

Maybe if my Pro fails then I'll reconsider options but for now I'll stick with what I have. If Neo users want to beat me, they will need to be x% (add your own number for x) fitter than me :biggrin:

Definitely not interested in the Neo or Kickr as don't like the fact I'd have to faff with the rear wheel and also buy and fit a separate rear cassette. Powertap pedals not an option as they require new shoes. Stages and 4iii I've considered but they get mixed reviews, and if I'm aiming to get better accuracy over the Pro these don't guarantee this. The Atom I'm keen on as it does give benefits over my current set up, namely no dropped chains, no flat tyres, hopefully easier/smoother gear changes but I'd want to see real life reviews before spending that kind of dosh.
 
OP
OP
C

CXRAndy

Guru
Location
Lincs
Lee, super time up KoM. :okay:. Less weight always wins on long climbs. I'm following a chap who weighs 52kg, today he was 15-30mins faster for a half climb of Mt Teide than his co riders.
 

theboxers

TheBoxers on Cycle Sim sw
The qualified accountant

Snip

The Atom I'm keen on as it does give benefits over my current set up, namely no dropped chains, no flat tyres, hopefully easier/smoother gear changes but I'd want to see real life reviews before spending that kind of dosh.
The cost benefit of a remotely operated power switch £5, combined with a fan £10, new pedals £20, shoes £30, track pump £20 and a TUE from the local qwack priceless. Means you have promoted yourself to the point of being able to put several members here under pressure to perform. How much benefit the above actually gives is currently unknown, but everyone keeps complaining about a bloody trainer :whistle:
 

berty bassett

Legendary Member
Location
I'boro
Lee, super time up KoM. :okay:. Less weight always wins on long climbs. I'm following a chap who weighs 52kg, today he was 15-30mins faster for a half climb of Mt Teide than his co riders.
i dont know if your following that Andy lamb - hes playing out in the sun AGAIN !
 

bobinski

Legendary Member
Location
Tulse Hill
Lee, super time up KoM. :okay:. Less weight always wins on long climbs. I'm following a chap who weighs 52kg, today he was 15-30mins faster for a half climb of Mt Teide than his co riders.

Yeah, but still 1 second slower than me on the whole London Loop:biggrin:

Seriously though, cracking KOM Time Lee. Great power on the flats for a lightweight fella :okay:
 
Top Bottom