I feel like if the neo bike is cheaper itās a no brainer really. I would just make sure itās the newer rather than the older version theyāre selling. But other than that it seems like a no brainer to me. No offence intended to any atom owner here but the neo bike does tend to score higher on all comparisons. It has quite a bit more functionality.
It would bother me more that the other turbos over read if it wasnāt for the fact the neo is seen as the standard bearer in online racing. Iām surprised itās as high as 4%. But it just helps to put our smugness on another level. Weāre like the vegans or Tesla owners of zwift, we get all the smugness points, but without the need to give up hamburgers or petrol!
Thatās the thing, if I was in the market for a smart trainer right now, Iād probably be getting the Neo. Itās just that when I bought my Wattbike it was literally the only option on the market (ordered it a week after launch, received it two months later).
I have no idea if it gives me extra watts or not and I donāt care - not like Iāve got anything to compare it to, as I never had a wheel-on on other type of trainer before that date. Plus I canāt even compare my outdoor rides as my riding styles are completely different - on Zwift itās all short sharp sprints, whereas IRL itās long relaxed endurance rides.
Because my FTP comes from Zwift, Strava gets confused with how little power in comparison I put down on an outdoor ride - even those where I felt I pushed quite hard, the power stats it calculates shows up as being 90% in Zone 1 (not even 2!)