2 Things I would change...

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

lukesdad

Guest
As for my other suggestion, the sphere of influence within this forum, as i see it is with cyclists. if you want to influence motorists or insurance companies post on one of their forums. I'd like to put my own house in order first. One way or the other you are preaching to the converted on here.
 
Location
Midlands
 

lukesdad

Guest
Of course that £50 billion doesn t seem to include VAT on all services supported motorists, let alone other road users. VAT on new bike sales for instance. Remember my initial point was all road users, even though some would like to turn it into a cyclist vs motorist debate. If your going to bring in extremeties, there is value of employment associated with such services.
 

TheDoctor

Noble and true, with a heart of steel
Moderator
Location
The TerrorVortex
Didn't even think of it. You do seem determined to have a row with me though...
Not at all, you' d know if i wanted a row i can assure you ^_^

Heh-heh :biggrin:
Fairynuff, obviously me misreading it then :thumbsup:

The problem with ringfencing things - taxes from road users only being spent on roads - is where do you stop?
I don't have kids - should I be taxed to pay for schools? Does a lifetime of hard drinking entitle me to a replacement liver on demand? After all, the tax on alcohol has paid for the operation...
It's a tricky one.
 

srw

It's a bit more complicated than that...
1827572 said:
Did you read the part entitled "Externalities" starting at paragraph 45?
£70bn to £95bn?!?!? Most of it for congestion????!!!! Cripes.
 

lukesdad

Guest
I see a bit of Govt. spin is tolerated when it suits ^_^

Unfortunately you ve missed the trick on congestion costs, under the proposal havn t you ? I thought you would have been a bit smarter than that.
 
Location
Midlands
1828644 said:
By spin you mean soundly based and well argued points which usually end up sadly wasted?
I admit to posting the link ^_^ however, I have not seen any points - either soundly based or well argued - in fact I am a bit of a loss really to see what is being "debated" :rolleyes:
 
Top Bottom