Sadly you will not convince people like me to give up our cars as a hobby, never ever its just not going to happen, no chance, forget it. It doesn't matter what anyone says or even legislate, it'll be like asking a vegan to stop eating tofu!!
However I've completely given up on combustion cars now, its EVs only from this point forwards. It’s a shame the £6K EV grant doesn’t look like its going to appear, as price remains the biggest problem with EVs, and anything that the government can do to help people switch to EVs in my book is a good idea.
I'm not trying to get anyone to give anything up. I simply dont think the government should be subsidising it. leaving aside the moral issue of walkers and cyclists who pay tax subsidising car drivers, loom what happened the last time our government tried to interfere on a large scale with the new car market by creating a favourable taxation regime for diseasels. Oops!
And cars as a "hobby" is a slowly dying phenomenon. Environmental and social pressure
is slowly getting people to give it up. The petrolhead scene is a pale imitation of what it was in the 00's. As time goes by it is slowly becoming a little frowned upon to be a petrolhead (or electric head?) and that will only accelerate. Personally I could never fathom it anyway - you cant go faster than the speed limit, and a lot of the time in urban areas and traffic that is unattainable anyway. What is there to get turned on about? Do you get excited over the toaster or lawnmowe? Of course you don't, so why get all moist over another domestic tool? I try to spend as little time as possible in mine because driving today is a hateful chore, not something to relish.
As an aside, cant you get the bike in the car? I thought it was the best family car in the world?

I can get the family, the dog and the bike with wheels attached into my old tank.
But worstt is ridiculous to suggest an EV is automatically a better choice than a conventional car. Dont get me wrong, I've no downer on EVs at all, were I ever likely to buy another car it would probably be a Tesla (my driving days are done when this one dies, so that won't happen) but that statement is simply indefensible..
Their manufacture, use and disposal still pollutes, and even in the most optimistic scenarios that is still not significantly better than the best ICE cars. Indeed, over half or particulate emissions come from tyres and brakes...
The mere act of shipping them half way around the planet is polluting and destructive...
The extraction of the rare earth metals is one of the most destructive and polluting industrial processes know to man. My first degree was in planetary studies, and I'm struggling to thing of an industrial process that is more damaging...
They still cause congestion...
They take up as much parking space as any other car...
Like it or not range is an issue. Mrs D's T8 can manage 700 miles, whether the heater and lights are on or not, and can be refilled instantly, yet for all the local motoring runs on electricity quite happily...
They kill, maim and endanger just as effectively as any other car...
They are bad for personal finances, just the same as any other car, as people take loans, finance and PCP to cover their cost. An economy top heavy with debt is not a resilient one at times of crisis, as the crash of the 00's and more recently C19 have proven...
The nature of the materials used in their manufacture and their sources actually increase reliance on foreign oil (where do you think all those plastics come from?), not reduces it.
They increase our reliance on foreign sources of strategic materials, copper, gold, lithium, gallium, indium ...
I have no issue at all with them - they will undoubtedly be a notable part of the motoring future, and won't go away. My issue is with specious claims that they solve all sorts of problems, when the only real benefit is lack of
tailpipe emissions. Being generous they solve very little, and bring with them their own problems and deficiencies. We'd be interested in hearing what other problems you think they solve, or how they're in any way fundamentally "better" choice?