Linford
Guest
I don't think Greg's up for that, tbh.
Kaboom-tish
I don't think Greg's up for that, tbh.
We've already done this one - in this thread and in many others. The economic cost of motoring is something like three times the amount of tax that motorists pay.
You drive 15,000 miles per year or thereabouts. You generate 15,000 miles per year's worth of CO2, exhaust pollutants, noise pollution and congestion. All of which have a measurable cost to the country - a cost which adds up to rather more than the tax you pay.
What steps have you taken, through choice of vehicle, exploration of car sharing, use of public transport, to minimise the amount of tax (fuel duty, VED, insurance premium tax, etc..) you pay as a result of operating a car in the way you've chosen?
^^^
Classic cognitive dissonance. When faced with information that challenges your beliefs, reject the information.
Personal Anecdote top trumps Facts, Data and Research
The financial cost of everything except congestion (i.e. time wasted) can be calculated pretty much any way you want, to give whatever outcome suits your argument. I rarely drive at peak times, so my contribution to congestion is negligible. Whether CO2 is a pollutant is another issue, and if AGW were a religion (and it could well be) then I would classify myself as an Agnostic. Furthermore, no one is forced to live next to a busy road or motorway, that's their choice if they do.
There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. Statistics can be manipulated and rarely have a direct correlation to real life.
There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. Statistics can be manipulated and rarely have a direct correlation to real life.
You are of course comfortable with your life, and settled where you live.
Absolutely. Last time I changed jobs, I moved house so I could cycle to work, which did mean taking a hit on the quality of accommodation I could afford. I suppose I should have stuck with a long car commute and moaning about it on here.
Only an accountant would say such a thing![]()