But you don't need to argue every single point about every single subject. Honestly the burning of a couple of vans is negligible in the environmental scheme of things and much like the Covid risk, might even be seen as a price worth paying in order to make a wider point or try to effect meaningful change.
I've probably expressed this quite badly. Let me try again.
Could you perhaps have a go at reasonable discussion of the point? Looks like Winjim has had 2 tries at just such a thing - it's clearly not beyond the wit of man(kind).
The fact that I've had two goes at it and I'm still not convinced that I've properly expressed what I mean suggests that it might be beyond the wit of me, anyway.
Well he failed to troll winjim. Either he's crap at trolling, or winjim is a saint amongst us. Maybe both are true!
It was pure good fortune that I happened to have made a previous post addressing the exact point he was making. But that post was itself made in response to someone whom I perceive to be arguing in bad faith.
Was going to bemoan the lack of baler twine in that pic. Spotted it. Phew. As you were...
winjim has exams in a few weeks and really ought to be spending more time on the biochemistry and less time procrastinating on the internet and convincing himself that arguing on a cycling forum is somehow important.I can't believe that no one's yet got in a point about 'inflammatory posts'
Winjim is both a saint, and a hero.
In his own morning tea break.
Juggling toddlers, and biochemical analysis (or whatever fiendishly clever thing it is he does) whilst neutralising trolls with one (OK maybe two) swift yet firm strokes of his keyboard..
One day he might even get chance to get out on his bike.
