Rohloff_Brompton_Rider
Formerly just_fixed
but was there an increase in cycle usage due to cars being priced off the road?
I doubt it. No-one with any sanity voluntarily drives through central London. People do it either because they have lots of stuff to carry or because they lack sanity. In neither case is a switch to cycling a likely outcome.bromptonfb said:but was there an increase in cycle usage due to cars being priced off the road?
Parking for a day in central London will typically cost you something in the £20-35 range; if you can afford that, another tenner for the congestion tax isn't really an issue.bromptonfb said:really? the congestion charge is £10 isn't? it would certainly make me ride, but i am a tight northern git. plus parking fees on top? or is that a pittance to high earning londoners?
Ben Lovejoy said:The congestion charge was mostly a con-trick by Ken. He scheduled three years worth of road maintenance into the six months prior to the introduction of the charge, all of which coincidentally completed as the charge was introduced. Surprise, surprise, congestion was reduced and average speeds were higher.
theclaud said:This barmy con-trick theory
BentMikey said:Both Ben and brompton are wrong as far as I know, neither 7/7 nor the congestion charge had any serious effect on cycling numbers, they were just blips on an otherwise pre-existing trend.
BentMikey said:Both Ben and brompton are wrong as far as I know, neither 7/7 nor the congestion charge had any serious effect on cycling numbers, they were just blips on an otherwise pre-existing trend.
'Hates' is too strong, but 'considers a nasty piece of work' would be true.theclaud said:hit out at Ken (who he hates)
You appear to be confusing me with someone else there.and whinge about taxes (his favourite pastime)
Do you have some stats?BentMikey said:Both Ben and brompton are wrong as far as I know, neither 7/7 nor the congestion charge had any serious effect on cycling numbers, they were just blips on an otherwise pre-existing trend.
Ben Lovejoy said:'Hates' is too strong, but 'considers a nasty piece of work' would be true.
You appear to be confusing me with someone else there.
Accepted.theclaud said:Apologies if so.
The end justifies the means?Steev is quite right to point out that I know next-to-nothing about games played with traffic-light phasing. And to be honest, I'm not sure I care very much