simonali said:
Only real time I share a path with cyclists whilst walking the pooches is along the canal towpath. I'll always grab collars when possible if I see cyclists approaching, but that isn't possible if they tear up from behind me without a bell or "excuse me" as a warning. This seems to be the norm, I'm sad to say.
I find that this is an awkward area and I'm never sure what to do. I never "tear up" to people from front or back when I'm on the bike, I always slow up and expect the unexpected but these are the dilemmas I face:
1. When cycling up to someone from behind I always used to ring the bell but I found that a lot of people objected to this, they seem to think my bell means "get out of my way" and more often than not I'd get glares and / or comments. I tried saying excuse me please instead but that got the same reaction. Not everybody reacted adversely admittedly but enough to make me reappraise.
Now I hang back and try to make some other noise (no rude comments please!
), I'll click my gears, or ride over a patch of gravel or something similar, in other words make some sort of sound that can't be interpreted as "get out of my way". But this doesn't always work either, some just don't hear, or maybe pretend not to hear.
Still others have ipods or phones glued to their ears and no matter what I do they don't hear me - this is an increasing problem along with those who are so engrossed in texting whilst walking that they're totally oblivious to anything around them. In the latter case I can even be approaching someone from the front and they don't notice me until I'm about 2 feet away when they jump out of their skin and react as though I just teleported there, this is mainly teenagers and schoolkids.
So it's not a clear-cut situation. I know from my rides that there are a lot of people who, if asked, would say that I appeared out of nowhere and startled them whereas in reality I didn't.
2) I know I'll get jumped on for this but why do dog walkers on narrow shared paths think it's OK for the dog to be loose anyway?
When I were a lad it was de rigeur that your dog was on a lead (and a short one at that) when on any sort of path or road and they were only let loose in a field or park etc. So why now has it changed so that it's OK for dogs to wander at will on paths? Surely it's only common sense to keep it on a short lead when you're sharing a 3 foot wide path with other walkers, children and cyclists? Getting along together implies consideration and compromise all round doesn't it?