Folks, have a look at all of my videos. Exclude all of the videos that are of people on mobile phones, people weeing in the gutter, pedestrians walking out in front of me (surely I can't be blamed for that!), cars/cyclists running red lights, pavement cyclists, poor cycling by cyclists....
Then how many videos are we left with which could be called an incident where I could possibly (even remotely possibly) been at fault.
I've had a count (bit more detailed and probably accurate than previous).
I have 51 videos in total (not all public). Of those 22 are incidents as described above. In only 5 videos did I receive abuse from a driver. 3 of those was because I asked them why they had driven the way they did. (at no point did I swear at them). The other 2 were completely unprovoked.
I started recording using my ATC at the start of February 2007. Therefore I have had a camera for just approaching 16 months. I cycle 5 days a week, although I do have the odd day off here and there. I have 6 weeks holiday a year (I only took 5 last year) so assuming on average I cycle 4 days a week when I am at work (conservative) I have probably cycles to and from work approximately 346 times. This works out that I have an incident every 142 miles of urban cycling. Of course as Mike has suggested in nearly all of these incidents I had the situation under control and was not in danger of injury. These are probably the sort of incidents, had I not videoed them that I would have forgot about them. I post them so I and everyone else can learn from them.
This works out at 6.4% of my commutes where I have an incident that I post on the web. In fact if you consider that I actually have two commutes a day (to and from work) that means 3.2%.
5 incidents of abuse gives 1.4% (dual commute figure of 0.7%).
So for those who suggest that I have loads of incidents, have a look at the figures. Would you agree they tell a different story?
It really annoys me (I don't take it personally or hold it against anyone but...) when people suggest that I am at fault for incidents where I am taking a central road position. Forget the reasoning behind it, even if there was no reason, any driver who comes across a cyclist in the middle of the road should deal with it without having to resort to endangering a cyclist. Suggesting that I am at fault, just for being where I am, is providing drivers with an excuse for driving poorly.
So can I ask my detractors to take a look at my figures and let me know how they can justify the tag that I am having an excessive amount of incidents.
Bah humbug...........
Then how many videos are we left with which could be called an incident where I could possibly (even remotely possibly) been at fault.
I've had a count (bit more detailed and probably accurate than previous).
I have 51 videos in total (not all public). Of those 22 are incidents as described above. In only 5 videos did I receive abuse from a driver. 3 of those was because I asked them why they had driven the way they did. (at no point did I swear at them). The other 2 were completely unprovoked.
I started recording using my ATC at the start of February 2007. Therefore I have had a camera for just approaching 16 months. I cycle 5 days a week, although I do have the odd day off here and there. I have 6 weeks holiday a year (I only took 5 last year) so assuming on average I cycle 4 days a week when I am at work (conservative) I have probably cycles to and from work approximately 346 times. This works out that I have an incident every 142 miles of urban cycling. Of course as Mike has suggested in nearly all of these incidents I had the situation under control and was not in danger of injury. These are probably the sort of incidents, had I not videoed them that I would have forgot about them. I post them so I and everyone else can learn from them.
This works out at 6.4% of my commutes where I have an incident that I post on the web. In fact if you consider that I actually have two commutes a day (to and from work) that means 3.2%.
5 incidents of abuse gives 1.4% (dual commute figure of 0.7%).
So for those who suggest that I have loads of incidents, have a look at the figures. Would you agree they tell a different story?
It really annoys me (I don't take it personally or hold it against anyone but...) when people suggest that I am at fault for incidents where I am taking a central road position. Forget the reasoning behind it, even if there was no reason, any driver who comes across a cyclist in the middle of the road should deal with it without having to resort to endangering a cyclist. Suggesting that I am at fault, just for being where I am, is providing drivers with an excuse for driving poorly.
So can I ask my detractors to take a look at my figures and let me know how they can justify the tag that I am having an excessive amount of incidents.
Bah humbug...........