anyone know this cyclist?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
Extremely unlikely, passengers shouldn't be barred from using phones. The point is that a culpable driver who killed two children didn't spend a day in prison, so jailing this rider would make no sense.
 
Whilst loosing the country billions in revenue from business reliant upon communication.

More thought, less reaction

Use radio antenna on the outside of the vehicle to pick up phone signal, bluetooth connection inside the car.

Should allow for hands free usage, while stopping people texting and facebooking while driving.

Problem solved.
 
Just make the penalty the same as for drink-driving:

CAj3_v6WUAAoZg_.jpg
 

Attachments

  • CAj3_v6WUAAoZg_.jpg
    CAj3_v6WUAAoZg_.jpg
    53.7 KB · Views: 40

shouldbeinbed

Rollin' along
Location
Manchester way
That's right nationally. So 1.8% of pedestrians injured and hurt by cyclists, who are 2% of traffic, so cyclists are less likely to injure peds than drivers even after you allow for the respective disparate numbers.
Nationally yes, but London specifically to keep the situations in context? and in the same time period?
 
Yes we have got that but it is a bit meaningless without the context of ratio of cycles to motor vehicles in the same city in the same time span.

Cyclists are 2% of traffic nationally, much higher in London, yet cyclists are LESS likely to injure a ped nationally or in London.
 

shouldbeinbed

Rollin' along
Location
Manchester way
Cyclists are 2% of traffic nationally, much higher in London, yet cyclists are LESS likely to injure a ped nationally or in London.
Again with the repeats. Context please & similar link as you're providing for collisions, what proportion of traffic were cyclists in that now quite distant time span in London?

I'm ready to accept the argument, I'd just like to see the numbers
 
It's a lot more than 2%, that's the point. In other words in the capital possibly ten per cent of traffic is cyclists, yet they cause 2% of peds' injuries, nationally the same rule applies. In the last ten years, just over 7,600 pedestrian were killed by motor vehicles while 29 were killed by cyclists. Over the same period, 364,000 pedestrians were injured by motor vehicles, almost 76,000 (or 21%) of them seriously while cyclists injured just over 2,600 with roughly the same proportion (22%) being considered serious. You are 263 times more likely to be killed by a motor vehicle than by a bicycle.
 
Cyclists are 2% of traffic nationally, much higher in London, yet cyclists are LESS likely to injure a ped nationally or in London.


It's all about risk.... Innit?

I remember one article that compares accidents per mile travelled and proved that per mile cyclist are by far the greater danger
 
Top Bottom