Origamist
Legendary Member
jimboalee said:So what's the conclusion?
CycleCraft is the 'Correct' way to ride a bike.
Cyclecraft is a distillation of the current received wisdom on how best to ride a bike on the road. However, what is considered best practice has changed over the years and will continue to evolve.
jimboalee said:Ride in 'Primary' but move to Secondary when the kerb is clear.
"Be assertive",
Ride in a position where you can be clearly seen,
Etc, etc.
I'll extend my offer again - if you want me to send you the latest edition of Cyclecraft I'll pop it in the post. It will save you the effort of trying to clumsily condense other peoples' interpretations of the text.
jimboalee said:What we are saying is our experiences suggest motorists consider this cycling style to be arrogant, selfish and obstructive.
Some do, most don't. I don't get anywhere near the amount of grief that you seem to imagine and I ride most of my commute in primary.
jimboalee said:Then cyclists wonder why motorists shout at, curse and generally dislike cyclists.
Some people have disliked cyclists since the invention of the motor car (and before that), Jim .
jimboalee said:Maybe we CAN'T have it both ways. Maybe we should yield sometimes.
Of course, no one is suggesting otherwise. However, when we want to ride in a more prominent position, we do so for perceived safety reasons.
jimboalee said:Maybe Primary should be in the nearside tyre tracks and Secondary should be in the centre when obstructions are present.
I actually have a bit of sympathy with that view - I've never been a fan of the nomenclature used by Franklin.