classic33
Leg End Member
The e-mails are from Network Rail though.Ah no worries![]()
To be fair I quite like the station staff at Leeds, they've probably read the same news we have about dodgy eBikes and taken a decision.
The e-mails are from Network Rail though.Ah no worries![]()
To be fair I quite like the station staff at Leeds, they've probably read the same news we have about dodgy eBikes and taken a decision.
E-mail answer on the subject
Response By E-mail (27/03/2025 02.38 PM)
Ebikes banned from Network Rail property query - Leeds City Station
Dear
I have now received a response from our team at the station.
Unfortunately we do not allow storage of any form of Ebikes on the station, They can be stored on the rack, outside Princes Street.
I do hope this information is useful.
Kind regards
Ebikes banned from Network Rail property query - Leeds City Station
Response By E-mail (27/03/2025 02.50 PM)
This refers to all Network Rail Managed Stations.
Kind regards
Until cycle theft is taken seriously it will continue..................the "Ah well it's only a bike" attitude should be forgotten about and thieves appropriately punished. (and those who buy stolen bikes)
I’m still puzzled about the two hour cutoff. Is there an enhanced chance of detection under two hours? Who parks a bike at a station for under two hours?
Their policy is exactly the same for cars as it is for bikes.Sadly, the public by large is not really bothered, not many own or ride bikes, compared to motorists.
Now, imagine if cars got stolen with impunity, there would be an outcry!
Decriminalizing bike theft is stupid, with the cost of some bikes these days, it is GRAND theft.
It's smoke and mirrors by the Police (again). No way would they need to watch eg 12 hrs CCTV
eg somebody leaves their bike at 07:00 and returning 19:00 it's been stolen. Police don't start watching from 07:00 and finish at 16:30 when it was stolen to see the theft. They look at a frame at 13:00 and it's still there. Look at another frame at 16:00 and still there. So frame at 17:30 it's gone so back to frame at 16:45 it's gone so maybe watch frrom 16:00 so only a 45 min window,Could even do more single frame points to further reduce the 45 min window but my boring explanation goes on too long and tl;dr.
CCTV is recorded to hard disk drive these days so takes just seconds to look at each of the times to reduce the "theft window".
So this studying hours of video is complete twaddle. We finished with VHS tape with slow fast forward years ago, it's instanteaneous jumps to time points.. There is something else going on.
British Transport Police has reversed its policy to no longer investigate bike thefts if the cycle has been left for more than two hours or if it is valued at less than £200, following engagement with Cycling UK
British Transport Police (BTP) has updated the cycle theft section of its Crime Screening Policy on 5 January 2026 to clearly state its commitment to investigating bike theft.
This update reverses the BTP’s previous announcement in October 2025 that it would no longer investigate bike thefts outside stations where the bicycle had been left for more than two hours or was worth less than £200.
So which of their 2 officers will be dealing with that?


Good news! British Transport Police reverse controversial bike theft policy
Happened a couple weeks ago but I didn't see it reported anywhere, this is my latest cycling UK email newsletter.
the issue is its just the policy thats changed, which is a nice way of being able to show to people complaining, as I think Cycling UK were trying to raise funds for a legal challenge to it, that hey weve got a policy document that says we should do something about it, and hence why they were claiming this was a success.
but its not an actual commitment to really do anything about it, BTP have still got 8.5million pounds funding shortfall for this FY, still losing about 500 posts, 11 police stations, to save money, the rail unions claim actually they need to recruit 1000 more officers to get back to historic levels of about 15 years ago or so.
and theyll always cite operational commitments and resourcing as to how they prioritise which crimes to tackle on the railways,which is literally what this was all about in the first place, it simply documented the quiet part out loud ie bike theft at railway stations is pretty much endemic and theres little you can gleam or chances of successfully solving it as a crime if its been left for 2hrs or more, or is a low value bike and so was considered a low priority to deal with..
so theyll carry on doing what they were doing, ie ignoring the problem and just issuing you with a crime number for the insurance, its just not written down as such so blatantly anymore, or am I just being cynical ?
I've done my fair share of CCTV trawling, including several weeks worth for a murder investigation and its incredibly labour intensive. Someone else would soon moan it their bobbies were spending their days sat in front of screens instead of patrolling.
Its a question of resources, and they simply don't have them. They need enough lolly to do all the tasks they are called upon for, but they simply don't have it. The fault lies with the government.
As an aside, the public expectation of cctv footage is unrealistic. Its a very poor detection tool.