BozoneBiker
New Member
- Location
- Bozeman, MT and Cayucos, CA, USA
Just found this forum and it seems to mostly focus on Bromptons in the folding category. I rode my first Brompton this year and was unimpressed. It had the 16" tires, 2 shifters (Sturmy Archer), and folded if you picked it up by the bars and saddle. I could see it for an urban setting where one had to take the bike inside every time and had minimal storage space. That noted, it paled when compared to virtually any Bike Friday that I have owned and ridden. It was heavier than the 406 tired Pocked Lama/Sport/New World Tourist. Not nearly as stable, and seemed really poor on rough pavement when the bike frame is no rigid.
I've owned a Bike Friday Pocket Rocket since 1994, triple, 451 wheels, 22-112 gear-inch range, toured in 26 countries, and it rides nearly as well as any standard road/touring bike. I mostly toured with the trailer system, towing the packing case where I can fly it as normal checked luggage and get on any train or bus. About the only downside vs. the Brompton was that the Brompton quick-folded into a more compact package.
The Bike Friday uses more standard components than a Brompton, parts are more available and less costly. So what is the appeal of the Bormpton?
I've owned a Bike Friday Pocket Rocket since 1994, triple, 451 wheels, 22-112 gear-inch range, toured in 26 countries, and it rides nearly as well as any standard road/touring bike. I mostly toured with the trailer system, towing the packing case where I can fly it as normal checked luggage and get on any train or bus. About the only downside vs. the Brompton was that the Brompton quick-folded into a more compact package.
The Bike Friday uses more standard components than a Brompton, parts are more available and less costly. So what is the appeal of the Bormpton?