Do you use English or French?
I have no idea what that means, is it intended it be snarky?
Do you use English or French?
There is a lot of difference in walking along a pavement full of other walkers versus hardly anyone else walking at all. With a crowd one naturally gives way, which is not required if the pavement is infrequently used. It is the same with cycling. It is probably different for commuters where the importance of crossing the Rubicon every day takes on a new meaning. Cycling for pleasure means just that, for pleasure, not for confrontation. If a car or truck thinks it wants my space, I will readily concede, as long as it is safe for me to do so.
Well, it does if you aren't trying to get anywhere, and if like you or I, you are able-bodied, and experienced enough to deal with vehicles. However, for families trying to do the shopping, and kids trying to get to school, for example, you need to get to your destination in a reasonable time, and sharing roads with trucks and private cars is both dangerous and terrifying.
This is why the number of children and families on bikes increases dramatically where there's safe, well-built infrastructure. You may not feel the need, but they do.
Come to that, so do I: I was able to accept at least one job because I knew there was a traffic free cycleway following the main road from home to work: the alternative would have been riding on a busy road, equivalent to an A-road in the UK, which wouldn't have been practical.
In cases like this a cycleway isn't just safer, it's a good investment: it's a lot cheaper to maintain a cycleway than a road, so I was bringing in money to the economy while costing less than the cars passing me every day.
What radar scans ahead for passing places?

I have no idea what that means, is it intended it be snarky?
It was I think, a slightly humorous reference to the fact you said you were having a discussion with your routing app, together with the fact you were talking about routing in France.
There is a lot of difference in walking along a pavement full of other walkers versus hardly anyone else walking at all. With a crowd one naturally gives way, which is not required if the pavement is infrequently used. It is the same with cycling. It is probably different for commuters where the importance of crossing the Rubicon every day takes on a new meaning. Cycling for pleasure means just that, for pleasure, not for confrontation. If a car or truck thinks it wants my space, I will readily concede, as long as it is safe for me to do so.
As I've previously mentioned, if cycling advocacy groups banded together along with cyclists to shout as loud as the motoring lobbiesnaybe there would be some gains made. It took one woman in Holland to start a cycling revolution when her child getting run over was one death too many and look where they are now. It isn't a fast process nor is it impossible as many countries across the world prove. Lobby mp's repeatedly and don't stop until they listen. Currently in the UK it seems idealistic I agree but I don't think it is impossible and won't be tomorrow.

I would add that if you live in the right area of the UK, the process is already happening! (every week I either see pics posted here, or stuff from local news where noisy motorists are complaining about new bike lanes)
Yes, it's frustrating if you live in a car-focused regime; but it's encouraging to see many progressive places in the UK. It shows that the "UK mindset" is NOT universally car-centric![]()
I would add that if you live in the right area of the UK, the process is already happening! (every week I either see pics posted here, or stuff from local news where noisy motorists are complaining about new bike lanes)
Yes, it's frustrating if you live in a car-focused regime; but it's encouraging to see many progressive places in the UK. It shows that the "UK mindset" is NOT universally car-centric![]()
The "too many cooks" problem of British Cycling (primarily a sports body) and Sustrans (primarily route makers) and their supporters arguing with Cycling UK and the various local cycling campaigns has been a problem, but even if all current cyclists agreed perfectly, that would still only be 15% of the population, according to the last Active Lives Survey. I think it's important to remember that the Dutch revolution kicked off when the shouting spread far beyond just those then cycling.As I've previously mentioned, if cycling advocacy groups banded together along with cyclists to shout as loud as the motoring lobbiesnaybe there would be some gains made. It took one woman in Holland to start a cycling revolution when her child getting run over was one death too many and look where they are now. It isn't a fast process nor is it impossible as many countries across the world prove. Lobby mp's repeatedly and don't stop until they listen. Currently in the UK it seems idealistic I agree but I don't think it is impossible and won't be tomorrow.
Do you ever ask them why?I would love to see a dawning that use of public transport, solar energy and cycling are ways to reduce our bills, but most of the people I talk with seem to be slightly terrified of a life without a car.
..... even if all current cyclists agreed perfectly......
