[quote name='swee'pea99']Well, who would? It's a slippery slope tho', to imply as you seem to be doing that RLJing justifies or excuses 'retribution'.[/QUOTE]
Last night, on DIYSOS on BBC1, Nick Knowles, who I normally quite like, went off on one about cyclists. Obviously meant to be a bit of a standard comedy rant, but the two things he picked up on were RLJ and pavement riding. At the end, one of the gang of blokes who do the work said they were going to cycle home, and put on a helmet. Knowles said "you do that, and I'll run you over on the way"
So there you are. He seemed to think it was ok to joke about runing someone over, just on the basis of observing RLJing etc. Obviously, that was all meant as a joke (in rather poor taste, and I'm thinking of complaining, with a link to the story in the OP), but there are plenty of very angry, unhinged people out there who might get a bee in their bonnet over something, and lash out at the nearest person who happens to fit their general picture.
I don't think I in anyway suggested that RLJing deserved retribution (except from the power of the law). But I do know that lots of things don't deserve retribution (looking at someone a bit funny? telling them to stop vandalising a place?), but that doesn't stop angry people handing it out anyway.