Disc brakes on road bikes

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Dogtrousers

Lefty tighty. Get it righty.
There is no way you can "Bomb proof" a bike that has sat outside unused for two years. The chain and sprockets will be rusted solid and the tyres will be deflated and cracked. And in many of the times when bicycles were cheap and practical far fewer people rode them than is the case now. Not that you can't get bikes that are cheap and practical now, walk into any bike shop and there are plenty of them.

A fixed gear bike with solid tyres would go some way to bomb proofness. I can't help with the rusty chain though. Maybe stainless steel?
 
Doesn't it depend on how close the bomb is?
 

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
Of course. But consider, Clarks rim brakes are £18, cable disc brakes from same are £36. Would Joe Public rather their bike was more or less expensive? Do the majority of people ride in the wet?
If you are an ‘enthusiast, or a ‘sportsman’ rider who is ‘in training’, then disc brakes could be considered essential. But the estimate for cyclists who ‘compete’ rather than ‘ride casually’ is about 1 in 20. So the industry is potentially selling 19 out of 20 cyclists something they don’t need for their usage - like carbon wheels or aero frames when only a fraction of users can make use of them.

I think you have a third category. You say "enthusiast" or "sportsman", then seem to only include "sportsman". Many enthusiasts (I would consider myself one) don't compete, but still ride fairly often in the rain (hard to avoid doing so in South Wales!), on hills, where disc brakes are definitely beneficial.

And I suspect more will fall into that "enthusiast" category than fall into the "compete" category. Still a relatively small proportion, but more than 1 in 20.
 

Alex321

Guru
Location
South Wales
You have to get the toe in correct and the pads rub on the rim, and braking is uneven on anything other than a perfectly new rim and brake blocks.
Yep. My experience is bthat rim brakes were much more fiddly to keep working optimally than hydraulic disc brakes are.

As to weight penalty, the biggest one is you.

Very much so in my case.
 
You have to get the toe in correct and the pads rub on the rim, and braking is uneven on anything other than a perfectly new rim and brake blocks. As to weight penalty, the biggest one is you.

I used to go for the whole toe in thing, but I haven't bothered for the last 80,000 miles. Setting them up is just a 20sec job. Loosen the pad holder, pull the brake, and whilst keeping it pulled tighten the pad holder. I've never had a problem with things wearing over that time. The lighter you are though the more weight matters.
 
I used to go for the whole toe in thing, but I haven't bothered for the last 80,000 miles. Setting them up is just a 20sec job. Loosen the pad holder, pull the brake, and whilst keeping it pulled tighten the pad holder. I've never had a problem with things wearing over that time.

Same here. Assuming we're talking about dual-pivots - which must be 90%+ of road rim-brakes currently - there is no setup beyond (somestimes) letting out a bit of cable. That stuff about toe-in and rubbing is total BS. With respect.

And I'm sorry if that sounds whiney, Ming! x
 
Top Bottom