If you believe this you didn't pay enough attention at school when they were explaining Venn diagrams.Same here. Although they do seem to be concerned for my safety rather than trying to justify their bad driving. I suppose the logic is; cycle helmets exist, therefore they must be necessary.
Me too.I simply don't care, and I'd prefer if people who saw me riding without one didn't care either.
If it's 'just about opinions' why make the claims that you did? Do you know the difference between a fact,Sorry. I didn't know there was a thread already about this but bear I my mind opinions are opinions. It's just about opinions.
Well next time just make sure they hear you, and also go on to explain that they are considerably more at risk of being killed or injured by a motor vehicle than you are. The statisitics are clear, and I've long been an advocate for compulsory helmets for pedestrians.A person standing on the pavement watching the Veteran Car London to Brighton run as we cycled past saw fit to yell, 'Where's your helmet?', to which I did reply, 'Where's yours?', but I was going too fast and they probably didn't hear.
I dare say we all understand what a venn diagram is, but what would you put in each circle and in any overlaps; union and intersection are the terms I believe?I'm not sure if it's possible to explain a two circle Venn diagram without being especially patronising.