Would you recommend nuking the garage if Saluki doesn't get reparations?Actually, not much. I'd have just sent him a txt and asked, then passed it off as my own encyclopaedic knowledge![]()

Would you recommend nuking the garage if Saluki doesn't get reparations?Actually, not much. I'd have just sent him a txt and asked, then passed it off as my own encyclopaedic knowledge![]()
The Saab garage doesn't do the MOTs, we've just dug out the MOT cert. It's another chap, around the corner so Saab person unlikely to be that bothered about it, I shouldn't think as it's not going to affect his livelihood if the local MOT garage crashes and burns.Damn - I knew the answer to this one, but it's already been answered!
In all honesty if the garage are "at it" he's more likely to be worried about VOSA than TS as they are more likely to take swift action, which could well hit his pocket.
Removal of the DPF was a well known trick to get cars through an MOT which is why the regs were eventually changed.
Good luck regardless though.
The Saab garage doesn't do the MOTs, we've just dug out the MOT cert. It's another chap, around the corner so Saab person unlikely to be that bothered about it, I shouldn't think as it's not going to affect his livelihood if the local MOT garage crashes and burns.
I am off to bed. Tomorrow is another day and I am knackered.
Actually the car was purchased from the dealer who handled the MOT. The buck stops with the dealer. The dealer has to rectify it. I will be surprised if the dealer principle does not act on it.that may be the case im affaid..mot in house you would have a lot more leverage..
Actually the car was purchased from the dealer who handled the MOT. The buck stops with the dealer. The dealer has to rectify it. I will be surprised if the dealer principle does not act on it.
not according to the post 22..
I am optimistic that it will be solved. Best of luck.just having a coffee and on way to get this sorted out. feeling a lot better after decent night's sleep.