classic33
Leg End Member
Debian said:It's not for the maximum speed but for the actual speed travelled at.
No its for the fastest speed the vehicle is capable of, on the open road,
Debian said:It's not for the maximum speed but for the actual speed travelled at.
Debian said:It's not for the maximum speed but for the actual speed travelled at.
Jakes Dad said:If this was the case then most of the over 70's would need flashing orange beacons on their nissan micra's
Some of the modern tractors are now capable of travelling at over 25mph ... Fendt ~ Deutz and JCB Fastrac to name a few
Jezston said:I bought some cheap lights to put on my clunker whilst I wait for my insurance to come through. Was surprised to read on the instructions stating that you are not to use flashing mode when riding on the road. What?
mr_hippo said:Just a thought! Flashing blue lights are emergency services but what about steady blue lights? I know the law will have to be changed but a bar of 5 blue LEDs mounted vertically on the seat stays or panniers and only used in conjuction with a steady red light.
Vikeonabike said:Nope. Other than red tail light (including brake), a reversing light or indicator you cannot have a light of any other colour on a vehicle facing to the rear!
mr_hippo said:Just a thought! Flashing blue lights are emergency services but what about steady blue lights? I know the law will have to be changed but a bar of 5 blue LEDs mounted vertically on the seat stays or panniers and only used in conjuction with a steady red light.
Debian said:I repeat: why the fascination with blue, or any other colour lights? What's wrong with red? Why does anyone think they'll more noticeable / safer with blue lights? Can someone give me an explanation? I've already given my opinion that they're, if anything, less safe.
Why not have a bar of red LEDs?
Again to repeat, I've only ever used one, or sometimes two decent red lights and I've never had a problem with not being seen.
So, why blue?
Thing is most people who don't give a s**t (the ones that you're trying to change the behaviour of) once they realise you're a cyclist act like they always do anyway & all you're doing is confusing the more considerate motorists. Basically people are trying to use lights as a substitute for proper &/or more defensive road positioning.thomas said:I think because it's a colour that people don't expect from a cyclist so they'll act differently around you.
Personally, I'm more than happy with some red rears and white fronts.
GrasB said:Thing is most people who don't give a s**t (the ones that you're trying to change the behaviour of) once they realise you're a cyclist act like they always do anyway & all you're doing is confusing the more considerate motorists. Basically people are trying to use lights as a substitute for proper &/or more defensive road positioning.
Vikeonabike said:Nope. Other than red tail light (including brake), a reversing light or indicator you cannot have a light of any other colour on a vehicle facing to the rear!
mr_hippo said:Why do you think I said "I know the law will have to be changed..."? There was a change in the law when LEDs were permitted.
Why would I want a blue light ? I don't, I am quite happy with my present setup but others feel that they are invisible even if lit up like one of Blackpool's illuminated trams!Jakes Dad said:But why would you want a Blue light ?
If you fit something like a Cateye LD1100 or Smart 1/2 watt you dont need anything else on the back .. they blind car drivers so they stay well off your rear end
Would a blue light make you feel more important or something ?
Simon