rtfm
please explain !!!! ?
rtfm
6.1.4 In circumstances where sufficient width is available, tracks with some degree of segregation work best. This helps both user groups to keep to their respective parts of the facility and thus minimises the potential for conflict.
the anorak said:yeah, i thought so, no need to swear at me !!!!
anyway, a quote from your ****ing manual...
its pointless creating segregation for a reason and then NOT enforcing that reason, even on a moral level.
conclusion.... stupid
Arch said:The one thing that annoys me (in a very minor way), is when people look round, and then scuttle to the side and stop dead, clutching their children to them, as if I'm going to plough through them. All I need is for them to step one pace to one side, and not step back again until I'm past...
the anorak said:I'm sorry, but i find that ruling unbelievable. why create a separate cycle area and allow people to walk in it ???? anyone who chooses to walk in a clearly marked cycle lane when there is a clearly marked pedestrian lane next to it is a bit stupid
isn't that a bit like saying to car drivers... Always respect pedestrians even if they stray onto the road ;they are entitled to do so.
PS. thats not anti pedestrian, thats just a bit of common
summerdays said:I was under the impression that cars are supposed to respect pedestrians if they are on the road and give way to them - for example if turning into a side road and finding a pedestrian already in the road crossing it.
summerdays said:Nobody ever said they don't make mistakes ... (though there may be a couple on this board with ego's large enough to try and make that claim).
LOGAN 5 said:They made little effort to move so I ended up in the wrong gear and the chain slipped as I tried to get around them at 2MPH then crash! [/B]