Arch said:
Fact? Really? Is it? Can you tell us why?
It can't corner as fast as a two-wheeled bike. If it could, more people would have those than two-wheeled bikes. FACT. That's not something that needs proving, it's obvious.
It might not be obvious to
you, but with all due respect, you're in the "fan of weird bikes" category, which makes you different from normal A-to-B or just-ride-for-the-fun-of-riding cyclists. You like it
just because it's weird - that's fine, but don't pretend it's because it's just as good engineering-wise or performance-wise as a normal bike. We've had this argument TWICE before about different bikes, and you keep coming up with an even more ridiculous bike each time - this being the THIRD, and yet you STILL seem to want to persist with insisting that it's just as good as a normal bike, despite not being able to come up with any good reason why it's not more popular.
Arch said:
What IS the point of you, bonj?
The point of me is that I'm slightly more interesting than people who are so boring they constantly feel the need to rehash the same tired old argument time after time again.
The point of me is to provide input to the forum that at least makes a lot more sense than idiots who will stand there open-mouthed swearing blind that black's white or that a square wheel's better than a round one just because it was invented my a mad hungarian scientist who happens to be able to prove that he's got a hundred and eighty six PhDs and won the nobel prize for engineering back in 1642.
You might be (are) a nice person and you are interesting to debate with but you do anger me at times Arch.