- Location
- Glasgow
"That", said in a disgusted tone, was my bike, of course.
I was using the new widened shared pavement, our new "walking and cycling facility", a token to non drivers because the adjacent road has also being widened, as befitting to a "relief road".
Of course, both the road it is supposed to relieve and the new one are really busy with motorized traffic, but that's on the by.
So, there are signs, there are bike crossing lights, I am legit: also the local authority did send us the plans, with the new cycling path clearly marked
Not long ago I was using a shared pavement pavement part on a NCN, clearly marked ... "cycling on the pavement!!!!"
When I pointed out the sign, "ah, but they don't mean here, they mean the road ... cycling on the pavement!!!!!"
Bet it's the same ones that when I'm on the road with an adjacent cycle path shout " get in the cycle path!!!!!"
You cannae win
I was using the new widened shared pavement, our new "walking and cycling facility", a token to non drivers because the adjacent road has also being widened, as befitting to a "relief road".
Of course, both the road it is supposed to relieve and the new one are really busy with motorized traffic, but that's on the by.
So, there are signs, there are bike crossing lights, I am legit: also the local authority did send us the plans, with the new cycling path clearly marked

Not long ago I was using a shared pavement pavement part on a NCN, clearly marked ... "cycling on the pavement!!!!"
When I pointed out the sign, "ah, but they don't mean here, they mean the road ... cycling on the pavement!!!!!"
Bet it's the same ones that when I'm on the road with an adjacent cycle path shout " get in the cycle path!!!!!"
You cannae win
