HGV driver deliberately swipes lane hog.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

steve50

Disenchanted Member
Location
West Yorkshire
As one who does it regularly, there can be any number of reasons:
The lorry in front is slower; obviously. Tesco/Asda/Sainsbury all have limiters set at 50mph for economy reasons. Other companies have slight variations on the setting of their limiter. As @User9609 pointed out, a heavily laden HGV will be much slower uphill than an empty one; similarly a heavy one will be faster downhill.

There will be other factors influencing the drivers decision to overtake. For instance, I will do my best to get past any lorry carrying fish, which I regularly get on runs south from Aberdeen. They have drain hoses at the rear corners of the trailer; and the stuff that comes out of there - although mainly water - is not entirely pleasant. You will soon empty your screenwash tank if you sit behind them for long! The smell isn't great either.

fair enough, I can relate to the fish carrying lorries , we have a mink and maggot farm fairly local to Halifax that gets regular deliveries of offal , you know when you are behind one of those vehicles, the stench is enough to make you wretch.
http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/calderdale/firm-hits-back-in-row-over-smelly-wagons-1-1955541
 
OP
OP
Brandane

Brandane

The Costa Clyde rain magnet.
You'd think he'd understand that, he is a special constable*.

*Two of those consonants may be redundant.
Noticed that bit too. So he was an unpaid hobby bobby a few hours per month at some time in the past, and the BBC lap it up. Then they get him to pose for a pic sitting beside a photo of him carrying his young daughter. Therefore this twerp must be some sort of model citizen; hard done to by some nasty big dirty lorry driver. Typical BBC reporting.
 
OP
OP
Brandane

Brandane

The Costa Clyde rain magnet.
Here we go again; the world authority on everything has spoken :rolleyes:.
there is clearly a lorry in the inside lane in the rear view shot which the car driver looks as though he's only just passed, I'm not sure quite on what evidence you are basing your assertion that he was lane hogging.
Yes I saw the other lorry in the nearside lane. Given that the car was clearly going slower than the lorry that subsequently side swiped him, I would suggest it fair to assume that he was also going slower than the lorry in the nearside lane. i.e. both lorries were catching the car, but one slightly quicker than the other.
Your crass attempt to excuse the atrocious driving by the lorry driver says more about you than anything.
I haven't attempted to excuse the lorry driver; if you care to read the first sentence of the OP., and in subsequent posts I agreed that he deserved to lose his licence. However I am perfectly happy that you disagree with your slanted interpretation of my posts, as per usual. I would be more worried if we ever agreed on anything. Mods; please remember who chose to make it personal.
 

midlife

Legendary Member
Given that the video on the website starts with the flashing of the lights and the overtake, and there is clearly a lorry in the inside lane in the rear view shot which the car driver looks as though he's only just passed, I'm not sure quite on what evidence you are basing your assertion that he was lane hogging.

As for the suggestion that the lorry is electronically restricted to 50 mph that's complete and utter conjecture on your part. I regularly see lorries on which it is indicated speed limiters are fitted, exceeding the limits.

There is never any reason for tailgating, flashing to harass another driver or deliberately swiping them - ever.

Your crass attempt to excuse the atrocious driving by the lorry driver says more about you than anything.

The police statement I read in one if the papers said he was breaking the law by his standard of driving in the middle lane. That's not me saying it but plod......

Two wrongs don't make a right .......as they say.

Shaun
 

Joey Shabadoo

My pronouns are "He", "Him" and "buggerlugs"
The police statement I read in one if the papers said he was breaking the law by his standard of driving in the middle lane. That's not me saying it but plod......

Two wrongs don't make a right .......as they say.

Shaun

Clearly they hadn't had a chance to consult with Reg before releasing a statement. Expect a full retraction presently.
 
OP
OP
Brandane

Brandane

The Costa Clyde rain magnet.
Can I have a lolly pop?
Only if you promise that you'll never call it the "fast lane" ever again. It's not the fast lane; it's an overtaking lane, only to be used if the adjacent lane to the left is occupied. Calling it the fast lane only encourages those nobbers in Audi/Merc/Beemers to head over there even when there's nothing else on the motorway, because it's "cool", whatever that means :whistle:.
 
However, in this case, he actually says "I will follow until I see him being pulled over", but as he has a dash cam that he sells he actually means "until I get footage of him being pulled over".

This is not far removed from "crash for cash" scams.
 

Saluki

World class procrastinator
I feel little sympathy for the car driver, he was driving like an idiot. Lane hogs really irritate me. As for the damage to his car :ohmy: I've had more damage than that when a shopping trolley has bumped into my car.
 

Levo-Lon

Guru
I hope he gets nicked for not moving over to nearside..
then a reckless driving ban and fine.
i then hope he gets a massive fine for wasting 999 staff time..
trucker only caused a minor mark on his car ...and as nobber stayed in a position that stopped the trucker i hope the trucker gets a no action.
 
Top Bottom