Linford
Guest
[QUOTE 2023597, member: 45"]That depends whether you're going to then go on to say that as a bike is a road vehicle it belongs exclusively on the road. Because that would be incorrect.
I'm a road user. I'm also many other things.[/quote]
I struggle to reconcile with your logic on this. What I read from this is that you feel you should be granted rights to use your bike where you want to.
Just because the bike is built to go offroad, doesn't mean that it should be used there with impunity.
Back in the days of C+, when there was a very robust anti 4x4 contingent, and the NERC bill was being introduced, I had no end of arguments with people (you included) who said it was right that vehicular rights should be removed from RUPPs (Roads uses as Public Paths), and the only vehicles allowed down there was actually horse drawn vehicles - incidentally, we now drive one of the horses with a trap, and the nearest RUPP has been blocked off so we can't get in there with it, but the local farmer can still take his 4 tonne tractor down it and chop the surface up - as he still does)
Why should the law be enforced for the prohibition of motor vehicles on these now 'restricted byways', and they have to adhere to that, but you feel it right that you can ride your bike on the pavement when a similar law prohibits you from doing it ?
To a casual bystander, it might appear that you are happy with the application of double standards as long as the infringement favours your chosen pursuit.....
I'm a road user. I'm also many other things.[/quote]
I struggle to reconcile with your logic on this. What I read from this is that you feel you should be granted rights to use your bike where you want to.
Just because the bike is built to go offroad, doesn't mean that it should be used there with impunity.
Back in the days of C+, when there was a very robust anti 4x4 contingent, and the NERC bill was being introduced, I had no end of arguments with people (you included) who said it was right that vehicular rights should be removed from RUPPs (Roads uses as Public Paths), and the only vehicles allowed down there was actually horse drawn vehicles - incidentally, we now drive one of the horses with a trap, and the nearest RUPP has been blocked off so we can't get in there with it, but the local farmer can still take his 4 tonne tractor down it and chop the surface up - as he still does)
Why should the law be enforced for the prohibition of motor vehicles on these now 'restricted byways', and they have to adhere to that, but you feel it right that you can ride your bike on the pavement when a similar law prohibits you from doing it ?
To a casual bystander, it might appear that you are happy with the application of double standards as long as the infringement favours your chosen pursuit.....