Linford
Guest
2021994 said:Why thank you but will that give it magic protection?
Just argue the point if you want a peeing contest. I've got broad shoulders. I need them to carry you, Claudine, MrP etc
2021994 said:Why thank you but will that give it magic protection?
Walking down Wakefield Road, Bradford, last week with a POB coming up towards me on the path. As we passed each other I said to him that he should be on the road, not the footpath. Because a bicycle is a "road vehicle". He disagreed. It wasn't a shared cycle path he was simply taking the easy way.
So, is a bicycle a "road vehicle" or not.
Just argue the point if you want a peeing contest. I've got broad shoulders. I need them to carry you, Claudine, MrP etc
Just argue the point if you want a peeing contest. I've got broad shoulders. I need them to carry you, Claudine, MrP etc
2022040 said:Linf you blithering idiot, if you read back over what remains here, you could see that I agree with your fundamental point, that cyclists do not belong on the road.
2022053 said:You appear to have quoted me too quickly. Or to put that another way, I was wondering who would be first to spot that deliberate mistake.
Just argue the point if you want a peeing contest. I've got broad shoulders. I need them to carry you, Claudine, MrP etc
What is the benefit of broad shoulders in a peeing competition?
A horse is a machine for changing grass into obnoxious waste.
Then it will kick you or bite you.
A few cyclists perform the same function.
Both should be banned from the pavements
2022670 said:Try not to be quite so needy.
Not neccesarily - both could be trained, and wear nappies:So you agree with me then ?
Not neccesarily - both could be trained, and wear nappies:
![]()