Vapers appear to combine the self-entitled whining of smokers, and the ill-informed technobollocks of HiFi freaks. Thank fark they're unlikely to breed!
Nice.
Vapers appear to combine the self-entitled whining of smokers, and the ill-informed technobollocks of HiFi freaks. Thank fark they're unlikely to breed!
Edit - I've now read the whole thread.
Of course it's about the entitlement, and rubbishing any research that contradicts that.
Vapers appear to combine the self-entitled whining of smokers, and the ill-informed technobollocks of HiFi freaks. Thank fark they're unlikely to breed!
*ducks*
It releases a fog of who-knows-what, including nicotine, which we know is addictive.
If people want to indulge, I reckon its up to them to show it's safe, rather than for non-participants to show it isn't.
Or is it the self entitlement that smokers always had, only now it's 'not smoking' so that's OK?
It is for any new pharmaceutical
I saw a delivery driver in my daughters primary school smoking the other day, or at least I thought he was smoking. As I walked over to him to gift him my thoughts on the matter I realised he was vaping so I veered off confused. Is vaping OK in Primary School grounds during the school day?
Edit - I've now read the whole thread.
Of course it's about the entitlement, and rubbishing any research that contradicts that.
Vapers appear to combine the self-entitled whining of smokers, and the ill-informed technobollocks of HiFi freaks. Thank fark they're unlikely to breed!
*ducks*
Just bloody quit smoking. Vaping is simply a means of prolonging the addiction, not of kicking it.
The concentrations of some flavour chemicals in e-cigarette fluids are sufficiently high for inhalation exposure by vaping to be of toxicological concern. Usery limits should be contemplated for levels of some of the more worrisome chemicals as well as for total flavour chemical levels. Ingredient labeling should also be required.