Racing roadkill
Guru
Yes, what’s your problem?Do BC know that this is how you are representing their brand?
Yes, what’s your problem?Do BC know that this is how you are representing their brand?
Just that if they know that this is how you engage with people as one of their representatives, then I must get around to cancelling my membership.Yes, what’s your problem?
Please understand that the reason they appears as participants and not listed as ride leaders is because they are not leading the ride. On a guided ride, there may be riders with the leader accreditation who are not leading the ride and also appear as participants and have an "L" next to their name - having the ride leader accreditation does not make them a ride leader on every ride de facto.The ride leaders appear as participants, but with a purple L next to their name, on a ride Social. On a guided ride, they are separated, from the participants.
You can do what you like.Just that if they know that this is how you engage with people as one of their representatives, then I must get around to cancelling my membership.
Why isn't the "ride leader" accountable for what happens on their ride?No, that’s not it at all. I can’t help the purple L, that’s an automatic functIon of the system. The point is that if a trained leader sets up a ‘ride social’ and a ‘guided ride’ there’s little difference, other than the accountability of BC for anything happening on the ride. I prefer setting up ride socials, because they are less hassle.
You’re not getting it are you? Only accredited ride leaders get the purple L on a ride social. If anyone who isn’t also an accredited ride leader sets up a ride social, they don’t get a purple L next to their name. So anyone can set up a ‘ride social’ but only accredited ride leaders who set up ride socials get the ‘leader / purple L’ leader designation.Please understand that the reason they appears as participants and not listed as ride leaders is because they are not leading the ride. On a guided ride, there may be riders with the leader accreditation who are not leading the ride and also appear as participants and have an "L" next to their name - having the ride leader accreditation does not make them a ride leader on every ride de facto.
Good for you. Fortunately, there are going to be a lot of novices, looking for a way to get riding, who will sign up to group rides. It’s going to be a busy few months ahead I think.After many years of cycling unaccompanied during which I had become a competent roadmap reader, I was encouraged to do a few group rides. This thread reminds me of why my group rides phase was brief.
Short answer is that they are no more and no less accountable than anyone else because they are not "ride leaders" on Ride Social group rides - everyone is a participant and Let's Ride are only facilitating the organising of a group of individuals going on a ride together.Why isn't the "ride leader" accountable for what happens on their ride?
I take a group walking and anything happens, I'm accountable. Especially if I organised it. The same with most outdoor group activities.
The ride leader is accountable, but B.C. aren’t, on a ride social. It’s a facility that anyone can use to set up a ride, that piggy backs the B.C. system. On a guided ride, B.C. do take responsibility for what happens on the ride, hence the extra rules / regs / hassle involved in a Guided ride. The guided rides routes have to be risk assessed, and those assessments are on file, and there are strict distance / duration / terrain restrictions, dependant on which ‘training level‘ the leader(s) have.Why isn't the "ride leader" accountable for what happens on their ride?
I take a group walking and anything happens, I'm accountable. Especially if I organised it. The same with most outdoor group activities.
You’re not getting it are you? Only accredited ride leaders get the purple L on a ride social. If anyone who isn’t also an accredited ride leader sets up a ride social, they don’t get a purple L next to their name. So anyone can set up a ‘ride social’ but only accredited ride leaders who set up ride socials get the ‘leader / purple L’ leader designation.
You’re still not getting it are you? Anyone can set up a ‘ride social’ only accredited leaders can set up a ‘guided ride’ if an accredited leader sets up a ‘ride social’ they are automatically assigned a leader role, if anyone who isn’t accredited sets up a ‘ride social’ they don’t get assigned the leader role.Short answer is that they are no more and no less accountable than anyone else because they are not "ride leaders" on Ride Social group rides - everyone is a participant and Let's Ride are only facilitating the organising of a group of individuals going on a ride together.
In BC's own words:
"There's no membership fee, no club rules and we're all passionate about getting the miles in.Use the ride finder to explore existing rides nearby, or reach out to a friendly local group and share the miles together.If you want to organise a ride, simply join for free to get started."
No, the complete segregation / differentiation only occurs on guided rides. On ride socials the only differentiation is the purple L next to any participant(s) who are also accredited ride leaders.You are the one who isn't getting it - what you've just said does not contradict what I said except for one small detail - "only accredited ride leaders who set up ride socials get the ‘leader / purple L’ leader designation" - accredited ride leaders get the "L" whether they set up the ride or not - it's like a badge letting you know they're accredited - it is not an indication that they are leading that particular ride - leading a particular ride is indicated by being listed as a leader and not as a participant.
FFS!You’re still not getting it are you? Anyone can set up a ‘ride social’ only accredited leaders can set up a ‘guided ride’ if an accredited leader sets up a ‘ride social’ they are automatically assigned a leader role, if anyone who isn’t accredited sets up a ‘ride social’ they don’t get assigned the leader role.