Matthames
Über Member
- Location
- East Sussex
I reckon the police would be very interested in having a chat with this bloke, when they do I really don't want to be in his shoes. Get pictures of the lip as this could be used as evidence of the assault.
Devil's advocate: What stage along the scale of wrong-doing do you suggest people stop turning the other cheek?
A granny getting her handbag swiped, a child being beaten by an adult, a gang of yobs attacking a single male - these are vulnerable individuals who should be helped.
A cyclist riding on the pavement or a driver using his phone, whilst wrong, ain't worth a bust lip.
Note to Alexios. Learn karate.

I reckon the police would be very interested in having a chat with this bloke, when they do I really don't want to be in his shoes. Get pictures of the lip as this could be used as evidence of the assault.
I'm usually of the persuasion that it's worth saying something. If I see a kid drop litter, I'll say something even if it ends in abuse. As a point, I have done exactly that in the past and it has ended the same as above. However it still plants a little seed of Youcantdowhateveryouwantiums in their mind.
Whether or not I would do the same is almost moot. The OP has planted a seed in their mind. Can you imagine the conversation he has with anyone about it?
It's not going to happen. He's going to sit on that and brood for a while, and somewhere deep inside he'll wonder why he's bottling it up, and maybe... just maybe... he'll come to the realisation that hitting someone for calling them out on driving dangerously isn't the best way to react.
Edmund Burke, anyone?
Well put. Those of you advocating doing nothing, you should be ashamed of yourselves.
You are driving along at 30 mph in a 30 mph limit. The idiot behind is tooting and flashing.
You both go through a GATSO which doesn't operate ( because you are doing 30 mph ).
You... yes YOU have saved that idiot a £60 fine and three points on his licence for keeping him at the speed limit.
We all say habitual speeders need sorting out. YOU have delayed that idiot's comeuppence by driving within the law.
A cyclist rides in 'Primary' through a series of pinch points, which holds up and agravates the idiot behind. Within the pinch points, there is a GATSO so the cyclist has prevented the idiot being 'nabbed' IF he exceeded the speed limit through the GATSO. Should the cyclist have let the idiot through bon chance he will be 'nabbed'?
A cyclist sees a motorist using a mobile phone. He ignores it and gets on with his ride home. On turning a corner, he sees the motorcar in the side of a bus stop with women screaming and bodies on the pavement.
Did OP unknowingly prevent a massacre?
The world is full of shite people .I admire your stand .But not really worth it .We will never rid the roads of this type of motorist.
Good point, no point in fighting a war you can't win. Especially not if it puts you open to assault or worse.
At the moment there are idiots trying to fight their own little propaganda war to state that its ok to speed and use mobiles, and some to drink drive, and they do try and convice others that "nobody gets hurt".