Cunobelin said:I love the "Pace line" in this video
.... and for the next "SMIDSY" - the ultimate commuting accessory:
Good find, like cyclocross with automatic weapons.
Cunobelin said:I love the "Pace line" in this video
.... and for the next "SMIDSY" - the ultimate commuting accessory:
I think Cunobelin's mighty weapon has put her straight...BentMikey said:Why has lizban gone all quiet on the benefits of cycling?
“But if you asked which killed more people ion the last 10 years in London, international terrorism, or bicycles, the answer would definitely be bicycles.
BentMikey said:Why has lizban gone all quiet on the benefits of cycling?
It's not, because it's wrong. Casualties stayed steady despite an increase in cycling. What's more the quality of cyclists has declined. If the prof was looking for a cheap statistic he could have suggested that increased RLJing made cycling safer.jonny jeez said:I'm probably not going to make many friends with this comment ...but I think it's a valid bit of journalism,
Lizban said:Simply been busy at work! Glad you missed me!
For me the main benefits are
Fitness
Fun
Money rasied for charity (c£2500 this year)
BentMikey said:And spectacularly missed the point - that your point re the article and deaths per mile was true, but also completely wrong when regular cyclists on average live two years longer than the general UK population.
BentMikey said:Yes, I read your posts just fine. Nowhere do you make any acknowledgement that cycling saves lives overall, nor do you make any response to the point that regular cyclists live longer than the rest of the population.
BentMikey said:Nope, you still missed the point. You suggested that cycling costs lives, whilst missing that it actually saves lives.
dellzeqq said:fair enough, but what validity did the report have? - more people cycled, deaths didn't increase..........