I am not falling into that obvious trap.Shood be double points for pendantry ..![]()
I am not falling into that obvious trap.Shood be double points for pendantry ..![]()
I am not falling into that obvious trap.
How does one discover how many folks have one on ignore ?? That would seem like a noble stat somehow ..![]()
Create a brand new awesome post that everyone will want to reply to. Note the number of members who reply within 24 hours . Subtract that from total number of members. That’s your ignore total.
Photos of a Brompton on the Col du Tourmalet, obviouslyThanks for the Magic Formula
Second question.
How do i go about creating an 'awesome' post ??
Whats most likely to get the pulses racing, and the typey fingers tippity tappitting ??![]()
Whatever you do don't check Agent Hilda's ratio.I'm suspicious of anyone with a like to post ratio greater than one. I think it indicates a tendency towards simplistic populist rhetoric and a lack of engagement with any sort of serious discussion, insight or wit.
Photos of a Brompton on the Col du Tourmalet, obviously
Thanks for the Magic Formula
Second question.
How do i go about creating an 'awesome' post ??
Whats most likely to get the pulses racing, and the typey fingers tippity tappitting ??![]()
There's a relationship between quantity and quality?
When did this start?
![]()
I'm suspicious of anyone with a like to post ratio greater than one. I think it indicates a tendency towards simplistic populist rhetoric and a lack of engagement with any sort of serious discussion, insight or wit.
Photo of an Aubergine 🍆 that folds out into a fully formed Brompton on the Col du Tourmalet.
Inversely proportionate.
I hate her already.Whatever you do don't check Agent Hilda's ratio.
https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/bowie-gone-now.194208/page-8
Post #120
I couldn't remember offhand so had a search around for when it was last asked about. This is what @Shaun had to say:Uber, guru, well known etc, what is the full list and how many posts does each level require?
Mike
They are frivolous titles, based on equally frivolous totals of trophy points, for a bit of fun and silliness:
0 - New Member
50 - Member
100 - Regular
250 - Active Member
500 - Well-Known Member
750 - Senior Member
1000 - Über Member
1500 - Veteran
2000 - Guru
2600 - Legendary Member
3800 - Forum GOD!
When I moved CycleChat to the new Xenforo forum software I wanted to change the previous decade's focus on post count as the primary marker of an informed and knowledgeable member, so I removed post counts from view and did away with post counts as a user title escalator - because people can visit often, post occasionally or rarely, but post gems of info and experience that are really helpful to lots of people.
It's simple enough to click on a username to see the info, and now that you know the titles are a bit of meaningless fun you can treat them as such.
Of course if you feel mislead or cheated by them, other, more serious cycling forums are available (that's a joke BTW - you know, just in case you'd thought I was being serious ...).
In truth I never put much thought into it, just threw them up and they've been there ever since; besides, members who've been here a while can add a custom title now so it's easy enough to swap them for something more fun, witty, obscure or inventive.
Cheers,
Shaun