D
Deleted member 40597
Guest
Or they use a generic tube that’s also used on other frames.
It’s a carbon frame. I would assume it’s a more complex manufacturing process to incorporate the optional FD mount than without.
Or they use a generic tube that’s also used on other frames.
I'd also have to agree that most MTBs are capable of vastly more than their rider uses them for, and that something like a rigid 90s MTB would be more appropriate for a lot of people.
If you've not tried one, I'd recommend renting a modern MTB from a trail centre and having a thrash around on one. Once you get over the silly wide handlebars I'll bet you'll enjoy it and find yourself and to ride terrain you'd never considered possible before.
What I find really strange is that I see the riders of such machines doing exactly the same with them as what I do with my bikes; riding them on the roads, then getting off the tarmac on to a gravel path and maybe riding around some dirt banks with the odd bump, dip, and tree root here and there. The types of bikes people are often using are complete overkill for the kind of riding they are doing, and on easy terrain they are at a disadvantage compared to me because their bikes are heavier, bigger, and more draggy to propel around..

liked, but what's the female equivalent of big boys toys?@SkipdiverJohn in the specific case of MTBs used for "proper" off road riding, I think technology, geometry and riding styles have changed quite substantially over the last twenty years, so regularly swapping or adding bikes is not quite so crazy as replacing a perfectly good tourer/commuter every few years.
EG a modern slack angle 29er hardcore hardtail will be a totally different experience on the same trails to an older short travel xc full susser. Pretty much any well maintained MTB will get the job done, but these aren't really supposed to be purely practical machines, they're big boys toys, and I don't think the variety of bikes on offer is a bad thing for the consumer (even if they do only exist to push more sales!).
In the specific case of 1x12 drive trains I completely agree with your post - probably cheaper to produce, parts are crazy expensive to replace and there was never any consumer demand for it that I'm aware of.
Other innovations I have to grudgingly admit are worth the silly price tags, particularly dropper posts - it's not all emperors new clothes.
I'd also have to agree that most MTBs are capable of vastly more than their rider uses them for, and that something like a rigid 90s MTB would be more appropriate for a lot of people.
If you've not tried one, I'd recommend renting a modern MTB from a trail centre and having a thrash around on one. Once you get over the silly wide handlebars I'll bet you'll enjoy it and find yourself and to ride terrain you'd never considered possible before.
liked, but what's the female equivalent of big boys toys?
Liked yours and skipdivers posts as I'm pretty sure that many of these more extreme modern MTBs do very little serious bouncy off road stuff (written as an ex ride leader who once lead a very mixed bunch of riders London to Brighton, including a banker on a vast collection of expensive springs he desperately swapped mid-ride with a friend
[/QUOTE
My daughter-in-law has more bikes than myself, I only have 6.
liked, but what's the female equivalent of big boys toys?
Liked yours and skipdivers posts as I'm pretty sure that many of these more extreme modern MTBs do very little serious bouncy off road stuff (written as an ex ride leader who once lead a very mixed bunch of riders London to Brighton, including a banker on a vast collection of expensive springs he desperately swapped mid-ride with a friend

Swiss army knife bike. I can ride my 29er to the pub or on the roads for a few hours, then take the same bike on the gravel, bridle paths, woods and forests, downhills and really technical off road. It can do everything (within reason) It's far more capable when I need it to be and loses very little in less demanding circumstances.I don't dispute for one minute the modern MTB's are more capable on really rough terrain and can be ridden much faster because the suspension absorbs some of the beating a fully rigid bike would dish out to the rider.
What I find really strange is that I see the riders of such machines doing exactly the same with them as what I do with my bikes; riding them on the roads, then getting off the tarmac on to a gravel path and maybe riding around some dirt banks with the odd bump, dip, and tree root here and there. The types of bikes people are often using are complete overkill for the kind of riding they are doing, and on easy terrain they are at a disadvantage compared to me because their bikes are heavier, bigger, and more draggy to propel around..
I use my hard tail MTB for a lot of stuff. I like the wide bars for leverage and hate the feel of drop bars off road like the current gravel bikes. I ride in the lake district and trail centres and everything up to technical stuff ( steep dh Rocky expert level descents) . What I also do is use it on the promenade with my kids, or the cycle path to take them for a butty. Totally overkill and unnecessary but comfy and easier than putting on shoes and clipping into SPD on other bikes. Maybe the riders skip diver sees are doing the same ? Just have the one bike and use it for everything. How are we to know they don’t hammer the serious trails other days ?liked, but what's the female equivalent of big boys toys?
Liked yours and skipdivers posts as I'm pretty sure that many of these more extreme modern MTBs do very little serious bouncy off road stuff (written as an ex ride leader who once lead a very mixed bunch of riders London to Brighton, including a banker on a vast collection of expensive springs he desperately swapped mid-ride with a friend
Liked yours and skipdivers posts as I'm pretty sure that many of these more extreme modern MTBs do very little serious bouncy off road stuff
I just accidentally found a photographic example!So what’s with the fashion of tiny front ring and dinner plate cassettes? That’s seriously low gearing, 30-51 for instance?
Do they really ever get used, I mean I could probably walk really slowly and still be faster than pedalling the bike.
Maybe there’s a case for serious mountain up hills but round a trail centre or buggering about round the countryside?

I don't dispute for one minute the modern MTB's are more capable on really rough terrain and can be ridden much faster because the suspension absorbs some of the beating a fully rigid bike would dish out to the rider.
What I find really strange is that I see the riders of such machines doing exactly the same with them as what I do with my bikes; riding them on the roads, then getting off the tarmac on to a gravel path and maybe riding around some dirt banks with the odd bump, dip, and tree root here and there. The types of bikes people are often using are complete overkill for the kind of riding they are doing, and on easy terrain they are at a disadvantage compared to me because their bikes are heavier, bigger, and more draggy to propel around..
I was going to point out to you the toll road option (£1). It is a delightful graded climb with only the odd car on a wide well-surfaced road with superb views once out of the woods. You can also go via Porlock Weir further to the west on a narrower road marked 'toll' (but I've not been that way yet). I note several single chevrons.grovel up Porlock Hill
You have roads down there you have to pay a toll on when cycling?I was going to point out to you the toll road option (£1). It is a delightful graded climb with only the odd car on a wide well-surfaced road with superb views once out of the woods. You can also go via Porlock Weir further to the west on a narrower road marked 'toll' (but I've not been that way yet). I note several single chevrons.