Strathlubnaig
Guru
Perhaps posted elsewhere, but.... daily express pish
Take Bradley Wiggins’s recent accident. As ever, the driver is guilty before being proved innocent....
No; it will be up to the Police to decide whether to report the matter to the Prosecuting authority, who will decide whether to put it to a court, and THE COURT will decide on the matter of guilt. As with all other criminal matters.It will be for the police to decide whether the driver should have seen the fastest man on two wheels
Yaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwnnnn!There are plenty out there who don’t even bother to wear helmets
So ...... pedestrians too?Drivers have to pass a test, so why don’t cyclists?
Losing even more credibility now, my 5 year old niece would make a better journalist and put forward more credible arguments.Drivers have to wear seatbelts, so why don’t cyclists have to wear helmets and reflective clothing?
See previous point. Surely the Express hasn't stooped so low as to employ a journalist who writes such utter drivel? I used to buy that paper, but have just been reminded why I stopped.If vehicles must have MoTs to prove their roadworthiness, why don’t bikes?
Why the editor of that paper thought this worthy of printing I am not sure.
A young woman is still cross with her mother for having an affair with a cyclist.
Why she or her editor feel the need to share this and her irrationally negative response to all cyclists I can only guess.
IS THE NANNY STATE CHEATING MIDDLE BRITAIN?
HAVE ASYLUM SEEKERS CHEATED YOUR PENSION?
COULD FACEBOOK MAKE BRITISH SOVEREIGNTY OBESE?
WILL CYCLISTS DEFRAUD YOUR MORTGAGE?
HAVE THE FRENCH INFECTED BRITAIN'S SWANS WITH AIDS?