Moulton Standard.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Rhythm Thief

Legendary Member
Location
Ross on Wye
Picked this up tonight. I've sort of wanted one for ages, but every one I've seen on eBay seems to have been way overpriced. This one was £80, is rideable and was a ten minute walk from my house. Result!
 

Attachments

  • IMG20250620215351.jpg
    IMG20250620215351.jpg
    240.2 KB · Views: 0
OP
OP
Rhythm Thief

Rhythm Thief

Legendary Member
Location
Ross on Wye
My boss Matt is a keen cyclist himself, but he really doesn't get my penchant for odd bikes. This is his response to the Moulton... 😂
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20250620_224128.jpg
    IMG_20250620_224128.jpg
    134 KB · Views: 0

roley poley

Veteran
Location
leeds
good little work horses on which i took out my mail as a postman for years ...until i cracked the rear trailing forks so donated it to the moulton preservation society ...they went all space frame and pricey losing the utility they once had for a common man like me good luck with it:thumbsup:
 
OP
OP
Rhythm Thief

Rhythm Thief

Legendary Member
Location
Ross on Wye
Just having a very quick look at it this morning, as it was almost dark when I got it home last night (and I was four beers into my Friday evening). I'm no expert on these, by any stretch, but I think it's a Mk 1. The hub is a four speed and is dated December 1964, and the pedals are pretty worn but I think might be the original items. The brake calipers will be swapped for Weinmann items: original or not, I can't live with those horrible pressed steel things! The rear fork - a weak point on Mk 1 bikes, from what I've read - seems to be ok. There's a bit of play in the headset, but that's easily rebuilt.
I was toying with putting drop bars on this and maybe building wheels to take a cassette and fit it with a derailleur, but the more I look at it the more I think I'll just fettle it a bit and keep it reasonably original. Anyone know where I can get the pedals re-treaded?
 

Attachments

  • IMG20250621113123.jpg
    IMG20250621113123.jpg
    236.5 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG20250621113132.jpg
    IMG20250621113132.jpg
    151 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG20250621113142.jpg
    IMG20250621113142.jpg
    125.3 KB · Views: 0
  • IMG20250621113148.jpg
    IMG20250621113148.jpg
    176.6 KB · Views: 0

rogerzilla

Legendary Member
Yes, that's a series 1. The rear fork WILL eventually crack if you ride it and aren't sylph-like (men were on average about 2 stones lighter when this was built).

Is it a Bradford-on-Avon or Kirkby-built bike? The Kirkby ones have a K in front of the serial number or the year on the seat tube, and were built in a Merseyside washing machine factory. They are often quite poorly put together.
 

dicko

Guru
Location
Derbyshire
Nice to see your Moulton. Mine was a Moulton standard bought it in July 1963 from the shop it cost me around £34 brand new. Wish I still had mine.
 
OP
OP
Rhythm Thief

Rhythm Thief

Legendary Member
Location
Ross on Wye
Yes, that's a series 1. The rear fork WILL eventually crack if you ride it and aren't sylph-like (men were on average about 2 stones lighter when this was built).

Is it a Bradford-on-Avon or Kirkby-built bike? The Kirkby ones have a K in front of the serial number or the year on the seat tube, and were built in a Merseyside washing machine factory. They are often quite poorly put together.

It's a Kirkby bike. K65 is stamped on one side of the seat tube, which indicates a 1965 build. Which ties in with the date on the rear hub. I am a big heavy lad at over 100kg, so I'm wary of riding the thing any distance! But if I do decide to restore this, I think getting the rear fork strengthened will be a priority.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Yes, that's a series 1. The rear fork WILL eventually crack if you ride it and aren't sylph-like (men were on average about 2 stones lighter when this was built).

Blimey. Men were only 18 stones back then?

Seriously, I'd love one, I think theyre brilliant pieces of design, but I'm a bit North of 270lbs so I know how it would eventually end.
 
My brother and I were each given new ones in 1964. Within weeks his forks snapped off at the bottom of the steerer tube...over the handlebars and very significant deep facial scrapes resulted but nothing longterm. In those days no-one dreamt of seeking compensation. After metallurgical examination Moulton provided a new bike within days.

My bike's rear forks eventually cracked underneath after a few years. By then and after so many failures as above, the forks had been completely redesigned and were replaced (free, I think). It lasted 40 years and gave solid service so no real complaints. The design was completely let down by components (rims, brakes, cables, cranks & pedals) of the lowest quality
 
OP
OP
Rhythm Thief

Rhythm Thief

Legendary Member
Location
Ross on Wye
My brother and I were each given new ones in 1964. Within weeks his forks snapped off at the bottom of the steerer tube...over the handlebars and very significant deep facial scrapes resulted but nothing longterm. In those days no-one dreamt of seeking compensation. After metallurgical examination Moulton provided a new bike within days.

My bike's rear forks eventually cracked underneath after a few years. By then and after so many failures as above, the forks had been completely redesigned and were replaced (free, I think). It lasted 40 years and gave solid service so no real complaints. The design was completely let down by components (rims, brakes, cables, cranks & pedals) of the lowest quality

Yes, I haven't really decided what to do with this yet, or even whether I'm going to keep it, but if I do keep it I think I'll be upgrading the components. A square taper bottom bracket, aluminium chain set, modern dual pivot brakes and new wheels built around a modern dynohub are all currently on my wish list. I was thinking to keep it as original as possible, but it's nothing particularly rare or special and will be a much more useable bike with a little gentle modernising.
 
Top Bottom