Fnaar
Smutmaster General
- Location
- Thumberland
That doesn't surprise me TBH
I've never heard Gonads called that before ...One of them is an "angry young man" who carries a weapon in his car with the full intention if using it.
He is a liability that needs to be dealt with by the authorities
I would read that as a clear case of incitement to shove a potato up the van's exhaust pipe; and maybe let the tyres down as well
And rip the tools stickers off as well. Taking lots of paint with them!![]()
I don't think he had any intention of using it... he quickly changed his tune when the guy on the bike didn't seem at all phased by the baseball bat. He's a guttless pillock who thinks he can intimidate... but can't quite bring himself to be that intimidating, thus he resorts to trying to reason his way out of it.One of them is an "angry young man" who carries a weapon in his car with the full intention if using it.
He is a liability that needs to be dealt with by the authorities
Hmm tried both on the vehicle check and both come back as not found.View attachment 131375
For sale on Thu 26th November 2015 for £2,000, 87,000 miles on the clock.
http://www.ukvehicle.com/LX04ZFS/ & http://rate-driver.co.uk/LX04ZFSHmm tried both on the vehicle check and both come back as not found.
Rather ironic that the plate was CFC, being as him and the car are so bad for the planet and its inhibitants.
However, he does not so much destroy ozone, as waste oxygen.
Apt that it passed an MOT on 'All fools day'.http://www.ukvehicle.com/LX04ZFS/ & http://rate-driver.co.uk/LX04ZFS
LX04ZFS passed an MOT Test
Tested on Tue 1st April 2014
The vehicle passed this MOT with 71,817 miles on the clock. There were also the following advisories: Offside Rear Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3) Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2) Nearside Front Road wheel slightly damaged (4.2.A.1a) nearside rear tyre split on inner sidewall .
I don't think he had any intention of using it... he quickly changed his tune when the guy on the bike didn't seem at all phased by the baseball bat. He's a guttless pillock who thinks he can intimidate... but can't quite bring himself to be that intimidating, thus he resorts to trying to reason his way out of it.
oh sorry... my bad... i didn't realise this thread was an actual legal court case, your honour.IIRC there is little distinction in Law
He is carrying an offensive weapon
His intention is that the "other person" will believe that he will use it
That is sufficient to be unacceptable