My first deleted thread

[theclaud]

I missed "I bet she's good for a thousand-miler".
If that's what was said then by the OP then he is on his own !

I'm paraphrasing. It was schoolboy stuff.

 

[User6179]

I admire the heroic attempts at fairness, Wobblers, but the whole point of stuff like the OP of the original thread is to exclude women from the dialogue, and to start up a conversation for men.

That is fair enough but I don't think the posters on this thread saw the Original thread .

 

[theclaud]

That is fair enough but I don't think the posters on this thread saw the Original thread .

Well then perhaps they should shut the fark up?

 

[User6179]

[QUOTE 3358638, member: 9609"]I guess we will reach true equality when such an image will be as innocuous to a woman as a role reversed image would be to a man.[/QUOTE]

No, true equality will come when men start getting offended by naked pics of men

 

[theclaud]

[QUOTE 3358638, member: 9609"]I guess we will reach true equality when such an image will be as innocuous to a woman as a role reversed image would be to a man.[/QUOTE]
There is no 'role-reversed image'. The image itself is a product of particular social relations. There is no comparable context. You just need to accept that it's not about you.

 

[User6179]

I'm paraphrasing. It was schoolboy stuff.

So you made something up to score points !

 

[Wobblers]

I admire the heroic attempts at fairness, Wobblers, but the whole point of stuff like the OP of the original thread is to exclude women from the dialogue, and to start up a conversation for men.

Actually, I was subtly suggesting that @Pale Rider's post could be interpreted as suggesting that women get "the wrong end of the stick through their own ignorance and prejudice" which may not be the wisest course to take...

 

[User6179]

Actually, I was subtly suggesting that @Pale Rider's post could be interpreted as suggesting that women get "the wrong end of the stick through their own ignorance and prejudice" which may not be the wisest course to take...

Yes, but is he wrong ?

 

[theclaud]

So you made something up to score points !

No - I'd have quoted verbatim if the thread were still there. If people posting trash want their shite remembered word for word, they ought to craft it more carefully.

 

[User6179]

No - I'd have quoted verbatim if the thread were still there. If people posting trash want their shite remembered word for word, they ought to craft it more carefully.

No , If you do not know then do not make it up , not fair!

 

[theclaud]

No , If you do not know then do not make it up , not fair!

FFS - I saw the pisspoor thread. The exact construction does not matter much, as its author is not exactly Proust.

 

[theclaud]

Yes, but is he wrong ?

Of course he's wrong. Is it even a serious question?

 

[User6179]

Of course he's wrong. Is it even a serious question?

I Must of read the post wrong because the first time I read the post I thought it said - TWN got "the wrong end of the stick through their own ignorance and prejudice" which may not be the wisest course to take...

 

[User6179]

[QUOTE 3358660, member: 9609"]But women do talk about/refer to men in the same context now, in fact they could well be worse. I do appreciate how 40 years ago these images would have been seriously grating - but thankfully times have changed[/QUOTE]

Women exploit and degrade themselves now without the coercion of men , they think they are empowered is the difference .

 

[theclaud]

[QUOTE 3358660, member: 9609"]But women do talk about/refer to men in the same context now, in fact they could well be worse. I do appreciate how 40 years ago these images would have been seriously grating - but thankfully times have changed[/QUOTE]

What are you on about? Where is this "same context"?