Lawson has plenty of form for pronouncing on matters he knows eff-all about.
Ian H Ancient randonneur 16 Dec 2015 #31 Lawson has plenty of form for pronouncing on matters he knows eff-all about.
srw It's a bit more complicated than that... 16 Dec 2015 #32 3narf said: Err, you know what we meant... Click to expand... Yes. And @Milkfloat found a much better way of calling out your objectification of the delightful Ms Lawson than I would have done.
3narf said: Err, you know what we meant... Click to expand... Yes. And @Milkfloat found a much better way of calling out your objectification of the delightful Ms Lawson than I would have done.
Dec66 A gentlemanly pootler, these days Location West Wickham 16 Dec 2015 #33 srw said: Yes. And @Milkfloat found a much better way of calling out your objectification of the delightful Ms Lawson than I would have done. Click to expand... But OK to objectify the not so delightful Mr. Lawson? Sexist
srw said: Yes. And @Milkfloat found a much better way of calling out your objectification of the delightful Ms Lawson than I would have done. Click to expand... But OK to objectify the not so delightful Mr. Lawson? Sexist
3narf For whom the bell dings Location Tetbury 16 Dec 2015 #34 srw said: Yes. And @Milkfloat found a much better way of calling out your objectification of the delightful Ms Lawson than I would have done. Click to expand... Oh! That's what you were getting at! Hahaha 'Objectification' My God, what a narrow, sheltered upbringing you must have had.
srw said: Yes. And @Milkfloat found a much better way of calling out your objectification of the delightful Ms Lawson than I would have done. Click to expand... Oh! That's what you were getting at! Hahaha 'Objectification' My God, what a narrow, sheltered upbringing you must have had.